[backwoods-engineer]

You guys do realize there is a reason that Mark Levin completely dismisses you right?

Thanks for admitting to the logical errors of conflating issues and appeal to authority.

But I will answer anyway, since I'm in such a fine mood.

Mark Levin castigates those who say Obama wasn't born here, and therefore needs to be impeached. I don't hold with that, either, since

a) Obama already holds the office, and

b) Obama isn't a natural-born citizen, which holds constitutional priority over how pretty his birth certificate is.

The 2012 election is another chance. If Obama is not an NBC, he should not be on any state ballot for President, and if elected in that state, should not be certified by the Secretary of State for that state. End of story.

[douginthearmy]

I also noticed you did not address my point at all. Yeah, I took logic 101 too, bfd. Mark Levin says he will vote for a soup can over Obama so he clearly is not a supporter. He is also a lawyer with considerable credentials (chief of staff for Ed Meese). He can discuss any topic that he chooses and the fact that he completely dismisses the birther issue is relevant.

Tables have tops. We could call these tops, tops of tables. Each table has only one top. Each top only belongs to one table. According to birther logic, each top must have 2 tables.

1 top of table + 1 top of table = tops of tables.

1 child of citizen + 1 child of citizen = children of citizens.

Each citizen child does not require 2 citizen parents any more than each table top requires two tables.