Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CanuckYank

RE the CT connection:

I found several references that some “father” of OB (named Barrack Hussain Obama or Barack Hussein Obama or whatever spelling variation is the flavor of the day) DID in fact reside in CT for some unspecified period of time, and may have even attended some college or other therein.

BTW the issue of name spelling is another nagging concern to me - how many ways has OB’s “name” been entered into various databases? The following may or may not be the same person, w/o some constant of identification being tied to the individual (ie fingerprints, DNA or residence/school/work history):

Barack Obama
Barack H Obama
Barack Hussein Obama
Plus all the Sotero permutations ......

Let alone the perversion of Barack into Barrack that I found in one article.

Most LEGAL databases are going to contain a FIRST, MIDDLE (if one is assigned a middle name on their Birth Certificate) and LAST name.

From what I’ve read about OB, many of the reports on this subject are either:
(a) fifth grade sloppy reporting (not altogether surprising in an age when magazine covers misspell words and use the wrong tense),

or,

(b) the name has been cavalierly perverted in these various and sundry investigations.

Following the **TRUE** but mysterious BACKTRAIL of OB from the WH back to his birth will certainly be a challenge - it would be for anyone being investigated, even under normal circumstances.

If there has been any intentional obfuscation of OB’s history for nefarious purposes, then documenting the TRUE backtrail will be exceedingly difficult if not impossible, and will require SERIOUS diligence in accuracy of identifying data - much of which OB has INTENTIONALLY hidden from scrutiny by Executive Order.


67 posted on 01/27/2012 9:22:45 AM PST by CanuckYank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: CanuckYank

I’d have to go searching, but there was an article not too long ago by Philip Berg (who is continuing his own eligibility challenge) stating that the SS# is a red-herring at this point & not worth worrying about. He is working on the Minor vs Happersett opinion at the primary reason to challenge O’s eligibility.


99 posted on 01/27/2012 12:55:34 PM PST by Twotone (Marte Et Clypeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson