Posted on 01/29/2012 11:19:11 AM PST by devattel
You are correct; I didn't say that it did. BUT, that was the version that was supplied to Hawaii - and only Hawaii.
It was my understanding that the docs were produced and signed in CO, following the 'RAT convention -- and then distributed to the respective States. (With only Hawaii receiving the "special" one...)
Here is the first article I found on the subject. You can vet it as well as I could. I am certain I viewed other articles that displayed both documents and clearly explained that the one I posted in #33 is the one that was only supplied to (and obtained from) Hawaii.
I do note that the CFP article I linked also mentions a handwriting expert who stated that the signatures on the Hawaii doc showed signs of stress - indicating it was known to be a lie by the signers...
Make up your own mind...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.