Posted on 02/01/2012 4:41:10 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
She is an entertainer but she had great one liners and wit at times. She was fun to listen to—until now.
I would not really mind her switch—really-—but she had some influence and the damage that will be done if Romney runs at such a critical time in this country will be devastating to this nation-—if not totally destroying it-—he will lose and if he doesn’t—he will continue on the zero road to destruction. It is so disheartening to know the Marxist have control of both parties at the top.
I can’t have any compassion for her in such a critical period in American history.
rock em sock em robots... by marx
Ann seems under the influence of either LSD or LDS.
Coulter has lost Free Republic as supporters. Surely, she doesn’t think the Elders are going to replace us?
“The first hour of Mark Levin is done to educate Ann Coulter tonight on her cheering of Romneycare. Don’t miss it!”
bttt
“...Note that governments do not have “rights.” Rather, they have only powers.
This obviously goes for states as well, which is why it is absurd to argue for “states rights” in order to bypass the Constitution and restrict human rights.
Which is why the Confederate assouls who used “states-rights” as a pretext to restrict and deny the rights of human beings were anything but conservative. For only a leftist could believe that the state has a supernatural right to strip man of his natural rights.....”
Here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2841340/posts?page=35#35
As much as it pains me to say this I think we were gamed by some of these people, they said what we wanted to hear so we would buy their books and tune into to them for ratings. It hurts me as bad as it would hurt catching a dear friend talking mean behind my back. I feel very betrayed by the GOP-e, FOX, Drudge,.............. the list goes on.
And another point: Ever since she began worshipping at the altar of Mittens she would say in her column off and on: "It doesn't matter what (candidates name here) says or does because Romney WILL be the nominee"...Why was she so sure? Because she knew he was doing a Mike Bloomberg, throwing tons of money at anything that stood in his way including paying off a certain blonde columnist so he could appear more conservative.
Various things come along sort of as a nebulous idea and people think they're reasonable until the full effects start to get reasoned through. The first time I heard Newt mention anything about mandates was as a counterpoint to Hillarycare to illustrate how if anything had to be done it didn't have to be done at the Federal level like Hillarycare. So, at least at that point in time he didn't see it as anything like RomneyCare, OmbamaCare, or anything else that dictated what services were available to who.
Regards
I only commented on the individual mandate, not on any other parallels to Obamacare, if there are any. It seems to me that what most people focus on, with hating Obamacare/Romneycare, is that we are forced to participate or pay a fine. Newt’s idea isn’t really any different, and yet he is lauded as this wonderful conservative. But there’s nothing conservative about forcing people to purchase any kind of product. The three ideas are essentially the same.
Some of the videos I’ve found of him, and perhaps the Beck interview but I don’t remember that one specifically, he is talking about wealthier people being forced to participate because some of them are opting to not buy insurance and then will skip out on their hospital bills. While I agree that, if that is indeed happening, it’s not right for the people to do, I have to wonder how that cost compares to all the illegals making use of the hospital ERs because they know they won’t have to pay anything. I suspect that that total amount is much higher than the instance Newt was talking about.
I’ve never come across him saying that the individual mandate he was talking about being at the state level, or that it was only for low income or those freshly entering the work force. Even if he had, it’s still an individual mandate and unconstitutional. I don’t see how what he’s said, as recently as 2 months ago, can be explained away. And certainly it casts much doubt on his supposed conservatism.
Indeed! If Romney is the GOP nominee, he gets my vote. Obama must go, and I would vote for a syphilitic camel over him. Romney is a heckuva lot better than a syphilitic camel!
As for all you Ann attackers, no one is forcing you to read her opinion nor comment on the thread.
Flame away!
This obviously goes for states as well, which is why it is absurd to argue for “states rights” in order to bypass the Constitution and restrict human rights.
Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!
Cordially,
Bend Over!
You’re welcome! :) bttt
Ann. We've been over this a thousand times already at FR. The Mitbots formerly here screamed this over and over, that Willard's plan was great until the evil Libs supposed 'wrecking' of it. BUT your boy still loved it ... well after the Liberal 'wrecking' .... and commissioned a $30,000 portrait to highlight Romneycare ... AS HIS GREATEST ACHIEVEMENT!
Romney Gives Mass. Health Reform an 'A' (in July, 2009)
Wait. There's more! In 2012, I'm gonna get Ann Coulter to support this piece of sh*t!
If your argument is that such a pool is unconstitutional, then I'd agree. I'm just pointing out that I have never heard Newt advocate the sort of thing Hillary, Romney, and Obama, have advocated and put in place. Everything I've ever heard Newt talking about was an alternative to a big system so I'm sure there are more than a few things he's mentioned as possible alternatives.
Mark Levin’s rebuttal of Ann Coulter’s “Three Cheers for RomneyCare” article
The Right Scoop ^ | 2/01/2012 | The Right Scoop
Posted on February 2, 2012 11:00:24 AM AST by Sudetenland
Ann Coulter wrote an article today called “Three Cheers for RomneyCare” where she defended Mitt Romney and RomneyCare. Mark Levin decided to read her article, fresh off the presses, on the air and go through it line by line, “reeducating” her on why RomneyCare is not only wrong, but a big problem for Mitt Romney and all of Massachusetts.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2841503/posts
Coulter, go $#%$ &%*%#$%#
No flames here, because I do respect loyalty. Still, is it wrong for FReepers to disagree with Ann?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.