Which means, I gather, that the MSN has no objection in principle to the idea of an absolute monarch "governing" us. For only an absolute monarch can be said to be "above the law." Worse, the MSN by deciding what is "fit to print" on the supposition that what can be kept out of the public record never happened are not impartial conveyors of on-the-ground reporting of important public events. Rather, they have chosen to be the handmaidens of creeping absolutism....
Thanks for the great post, Sallyven!