[HiTech RedNeck]

At the least, Minor documents the doubts. It's unlikely that it would be claimed as the sole underpinning. The fraudulent BC may be taken as the actions of a party who knows he is guilty. Remember this is a civil case. The plaintiff is not trying to find Obama guilty of a crime.

[Quickgun]

Your post brings up another question, Why, when the first”birth certificate” was an admitted forgery, did the issue disappear with the presentation of a second, photocopy of another obviously forged document, and no one has YET seen the original? I do not believe for a minute that there is something on the original BC that might be “embarrassing to the president” as it was said. What could be so embarrassing that it warrants risk of impeachment and/or charges of treason?I believe there is something on the original document(if it exists) that disqualifies Zero from holding office. And if there is no “original” document that should also disqualify him, and make him guilty of falsifying records, as he has claimed the second BC as his? Just asking...