Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seven Minutes Of Rick Santorum Talking About How Great Mitt Romney Is
Buzzfeed ^ | Feb 8, 2012 | Andrew Kaczynski

Posted on 02/10/2012 5:20:51 AM PST by Josh Painter

Rick Santorum has backtracked from his 2008 endorsement of Mitt Romney by saying he was for “anyone put McCain.” But in this 2008 interview with Laura Ingraham Santorum praised Romney at great length — contradicting some of what he says today. In the interview, Santorum calls Romney a “true conservative” and says he “is someone we can trust.”

(Excerpt) Read more at buzzfeed.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatism; gop; mittromney; mittscabinboy; ricksantorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: Josh Painter
Looking back, it might have been a monumental mistake to support McCain. If Romney was the candidate, he might have defeated Obama, he at least would have put up a much more vigorous campaign than McCain did. McCain brought in many conservatives by bring Sarah Palin on board. This might have, unintentionally, made it easier for Obama to win.

I cannot fault anyone for choosing Romney over McCain in 2008.

41 posted on 02/10/2012 7:05:53 AM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady Lucky

Once again, the “conservative” base is a ship of FOOLS. The GOP Titanic. And the Iceburg is named Rick “me too” Santorum.


42 posted on 02/10/2012 7:15:12 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

I suggest conservatives fall in behind Santorum rather than taking shots at him that just help Romney. Newt will NEVER, NEVER win the nomination. Your choice is Santorum or Romney. It is up to you.


43 posted on 02/10/2012 7:17:47 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter
I tried to tell him. I tried telling all the candidates.

Forget about trashing your opponent. Especially if your opponent is someone you've promoted in the past. It will only come back to bite you in the Biden.

Instead, focus on Conservatism. Focus on freedom. Focus on what you want to do as President to make America great again.

Also, forget about patting yourself on the back for all the wonderful legislation you authored, co-authored, helped push through, etc.

To us (at least to me), "passing legislation" means bigger government.

44 posted on 02/10/2012 7:22:31 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Once again, the “conservative” base is a ship of FOOLS. The GOP Titanic. And the Iceburg is named Rick “me too” Santorum.

Your head will explode from all the nice things Romney will be forced to say about Santorum after Santorum wins the nomination.

Be sure to capture it on tape and e-mail it to me.

I mean, you won't be around to collect the 10,000 dollars anyway so......

45 posted on 02/10/2012 7:29:30 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Interesting question, what would Putin do to ____.

Let’s compare the next imminent struggle we face, to the last fight for civilization. Putin is Stalin, who was less of a threat than Hitler and against the Nazis.

Putin, even with his horns and hooves and tail, hates the Islamists and recognizes the danger they present.

There are but two candidates with the fortitude and common sense to see the threat of Islam and they are Gingrich and Santorum.

Putin would not even want to sit down with anybody else, and unfortunately we are going to need his cooperation in the next war.


46 posted on 02/10/2012 7:30:04 AM PST by Lady Lucky (Public education -- government cheese for the brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Following Duncan Hunter’s dropping out of the 2008 race, I decided Mitt was the best candidate remaining, and donated.

That was before I came to conclude, that it was Romney’s machine which sabotaged Sarah Palin, Herman Cain, and was the problem in the GOP.

Romney does not seek to do what is right. Romney seeks the presidency as an end. I no longer trust the man.

Ever think maybe Santorum in his own way, traveled that same decision loop about Romney?

How about we stop tearing down Santorum. After all, that helps who exactly?...

Barack Obama, or Mitt Romney. Take your pick.


47 posted on 02/10/2012 7:36:23 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (What if Obama isn't the anti-Christ after all? What if it's Romney?...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

2007/2008 wasn’t exactly a prime choice of Conservative options, just like now. At the same time and before this was going on, Newt was gaga over Rudy- not much different than Romney on the issues.

Just one example.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2008/01/15/4430824-newt-gives-rudy-credit

Maybe we can focus on what issues they bring to the role of Commander in Chief of the US Armed Forces and not stuff like this which isn’t part of the Constitutionally mandated role in the job.

The way I see it, we have two halfway decent options, Newt or Santorum. The other two are completely out of the question. So why would we help destroy either Newt or Santorum? Let’s deal with cleaning the overt RINOs out.


48 posted on 02/10/2012 7:45:30 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle; Admin Moderator; Jim Robinson

[I mean, you won’t be around to collect the 10,000 dollars anyway so......]

Are you threatening me?


49 posted on 02/10/2012 7:49:59 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
I would back Romney over McCain too.

I wouldn't and didn't. To compress it into a nutshell, I weighed Romney's facility in saying where he stands on abortion, against McCain's facility in saying what the North Vietnamese wanted him to say in exchange for a first-class ticket home. Romney found it easy to deliver the lines; McCain did not.

Romney, who never wore the uniform, and who has endorsed the slaughter of infants, finds it easy to say what people want to hear: I'm conservative, I'm pro-life, I'm pro-2A.

McCain was going slowly into senile dementia, but he still hasn't ever sunk as low as Mitt Romney.

50 posted on 02/10/2012 7:52:35 AM PST by Lady Lucky (Public education -- government cheese for the brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Why are the vicious attacks on Newt given a pass as necessary “vetting”, when Santorum is supposed to be considered “off limits”?

Santorum deserves scrutiny and has much in his past that contradicts the claims being made by many here. Especially after the rigid unforgiving scrutiny towards Newt, and the only one who deserves latitude is Santorum in that same regard.

Seriously, I still have faith that you are a better thinker than that.

51 posted on 02/10/2012 7:58:01 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

I too think Newt would be someone with backbone. Santorum on earmarks doesn’t bother me as much as it does some. I do not know where you learned your history but the Declaration does NOT guarantee us anything....it is a statement of principles


52 posted on 02/10/2012 8:42:13 AM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

For Gingrich? You? You’ll tear down conservative candidates for Gingrich? Newt Gingrich? How far we have fallen.

BTW, who did Newt Gingrich endorse in 2008? Did he do anything for any candidate in 2008? I haven’t found it on the web, maybe you know, since apparently it is critically important to you.

Santorum’s the only one left, but Herman Cain endorsed Romney in 2008 at about the same time as Santorum, and also said he was a conservative, and said other really nice things. And there was a time Cain was the one that was going to save conservatives in this election, and a lot of people here loved him, and then moved to McCain.

Clearly you aren’t one of them, if endorsing Romney and calling him conservative is this important, you would have never supported Herman Cain, and would have been a Gingrich supporter a long time ago.

BTW, did Sarah Palin actually endorse any candidate for President in 2008?


53 posted on 02/10/2012 10:03:55 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

How about Newt’s idolizing of Progressives like Woodrow Wilson ? FDR ?


54 posted on 02/10/2012 2:21:23 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EricT.
" Wow. The Newt supporters sure are terrified by Santorum since their dream candidate has lost every primary but SC. "

More like, terrified, desperate, and hungover by sour grapes.
55 posted on 02/10/2012 2:23:41 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter
Politics is politics, it's dirty business and only fools will think otherwise. This year you can refer to any politician as your friend and support him/her but two, four, six, etc...years down the road when you're running against the same person, all gloves are off.....

It's been that way since the day this country was founded and it will continue until the end of time......

This is such a non news story......

56 posted on 02/10/2012 2:27:58 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (The only solution to this primary is a shoot out! Last person standing picks the candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP; Admin Moderator; Jim Robinson
Are you threatening me?

Uhhhh, no. If you go back and read my entire post, you'll notice that the first sentence contained what is commonly known in the business as "a joke".

Typically this is abundantly clear to those who posess what is known as "a sense of humor". Apparently yours was violently sucked out moments before birth.

To wit, "Your head will explode from all the nice things Romney will be forced to say about Santorum after Santorum wins the nomination. Be sure to capture it on tape and e-mail it to me."

You see, there's this TV show called "America's Funniest Home Videos in which the winner of each episode wins 10,00 dollars. If and when your head explodes, you won't be around to collect.....oh, forget it....when you have to explain it, it looses all its funniness.

57 posted on 02/10/2012 8:41:05 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
BTW, did Sarah Palin actually endorse any candidate for President in 2008?

What does that mean?

58 posted on 02/10/2012 9:08:35 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; CharlesWayneCT

I can tell you with certainty that she did not endorse Romney, a few years ago a romneybot tried to claim that, but I cured him of that.


59 posted on 02/10/2012 9:12:19 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: magritte
Why? Even FR was pro-Romney in 2008.

I wasn't, I don't recall Jim Robinson being pro-Romney. I do remember an almost Paul like cult movement of Mormon/Romney freepers who drove a lot of Romney stuff here, but as liberals, most of them have either been banned for various liberalisms, or quit posting after he dropped out of the primary, since they were not really interested in conservatism.

60 posted on 02/10/2012 9:32:28 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson