Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum surges into the lead (National poll Santorum 38%, Romney 23%)
Public Policy Polling ^ | 02/11/2012 | Public Policy Polling

Posted on 02/11/2012 6:19:11 AM PST by Rational Thought

Riding a wave of momentum from his trio of victories on Tuesday Rick Santorum has opened up a wide lead in PPP's newest national poll. He's at 38% to 23% for Mitt Romney, 17% for Newt Gingrich, and 13% for Ron Paul.

Part of the reason for Santorum's surge is his own high level of popularity. 64% of voters see him favorably to only 22% with a negative one. But the other, and maybe more important, reason is that Republicans are significantly souring on both Romney and Gingrich. Romney's favorability is barely above water at 44/43, representing a 23 point net decline from our December national poll when he was +24 (55/31). Gingrich has fallen even further. A 44% plurality of GOP voters now hold a negative opinion of him to only 42% with a positive one. That's a 34 point drop from 2 months ago when he was at +32 (60/28).

(Excerpt) Read more at publicpolicypolling.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; election; happydance; mittromney; newt; polls; ricksantorum; santorum; santorum2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 251-300301-350351-400 ... 451-463 next last
To: C. Edmund Wright

Thank you for your efforts.

Stay the course.... the America we knew is worth it.

GO NEWT GO—it’s about the survival of our country!!


301 posted on 02/11/2012 10:43:42 AM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~..... GO NEWT GO--itÂ’s about the survival of our country!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

>> Norris will be proven more up to speed on Santorum than Rush. Amazing aint’ it?

The radio cons are treating Santorum as if he’s performing his first piano recital — accolades for effort.


302 posted on 02/11/2012 10:44:38 AM PST by Gene Eric (C'mon, Virginia -- are you with us or against us?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

I don’t find making fun of a candidate’s kids funny...

nice username...it suits you


303 posted on 02/11/2012 10:47:33 AM PST by wardaddy (I am a social conservative. My political party left me(again). They can go to hell in a bucket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

>> And the MSM will rip him into dry kindling.

But not until they’re sure Newt has been eliminated.


304 posted on 02/11/2012 10:47:48 AM PST by Gene Eric (C'mon, Virginia -- are you with us or against us?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric
The Left is pushing Santorum and Romney to keep Newt out.

Of course the media is on board 100% to get the job done. Newt is the GOP'S threat even moreso at this juncture...it's going to be an uphill battle all the way to the Whitehouse....but let's get Newt there!!!!!

Go Newt Go go go Newt GO!!!!!!!!!!

305 posted on 02/11/2012 10:50:16 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

[nice username...it suits you]

Coming from the likes of you, thanks for the compliment! It must be working after all........


306 posted on 02/11/2012 10:50:16 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

It’s too bad. These two have a stain on them now, and people just won’t forget it. They’ll always been seen as hating each other and just wallowing in personal attacks. Didn’t do EITHER of them any good .....

but I maintain, that JERK Romney started it!! Newt was caught between a rock and hard place. He was right in fighting back, but he should have just tempered it a bit and mixed it in with positive ...instead he went TOTALLY on the offense.

Hopefully, Newt can shake that off as time goes on ...


307 posted on 02/11/2012 10:51:54 AM PST by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: caww

I’m not concerned with Rick not being on the ballot in DC. But if all this points to why Rick can’t win, and Rick is thumping Newt, Mitt and Ron. Who can win? If Newt was doing so well, where has he won besides South Carolina? In my opinion, Newt’s negatives are too high to win in a general election. We all have opinions. What matters is results. I am not asking for anyone to get out till after Super Tuesday.

If Newt cannot sweep the South, there is not ANY way he could take the nomination. If Rick stays hot, he can get there. He is leading in Michigan. He will likely take Pennsylvania. Time will tell if he can do well in the South. If Rick and Newt cannot enough to stay on top, they should both stay in the hope of a brokered convention.


308 posted on 02/11/2012 10:52:12 AM PST by FresnoRobert (When born, you cried and the world rejoiced. Live your life so that when you die, it's reversed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Lady Lucky
The daughter with her small head on enormous body, her face puckered up with the same dyspeptic look her father sports most of the time

You ought to be ashamed of yourself...really.

309 posted on 02/11/2012 10:54:41 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: bushinohio
You keep clinging to your belief that Newt is really a rock solid conservative, meanwhile I’ll live in reality.

Well I just gotta chime in here.....

Do we want a "More" conservative candidate in some eyes? Or.... an "EFFECTIVE CONSERVATIVE"...which no one can argue with Newt's accomplishments as he's done more for conservatism than all the candidates running put together..and that "EFFECTIVELY".

310 posted on 02/11/2012 10:55:46 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
This is the danger of amateurs trying for in depth political analysis.

You need to yank that plank out of your own eye, Ed.

311 posted on 02/11/2012 10:59:24 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: caww; TitansAFC; onyx
I would say that Titan is looking at the same material Newt's campaign is analyzing.

It a long game. The coach doesn't put his star player in for every second of every play: the quarterback doesn't carry the ball every time it's snapped.

There are reverses, double reverses, Hail-Mary passes, and short hand offs. Defense out maneuvers, steps aside, pulls the occasional offside etc.

It looks more and more that both Little Ricky and Uncle Ronnie are members of the team to beat the NV odds/Champion-makers AKA GOPEe They promote the team who has the biggest, fastest, meanest players that money can buy. They’re forgetting that those teams can and often are over hyped by the MSM and don't deal with the grit of the underdog. (See Milan Indiana Basketball/HOOSIERS)

Time and again the fans are cheering on the under dogs. We're setting up our own “Dream Team” We've got a coach who not only understand the game, but makes up the plays as they are needed.

GO TEAM
GO NEWT

312 posted on 02/11/2012 10:59:31 AM PST by hoosiermama (Stand with God and Sarah, the Gipper and Newt will be standing next to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: caww

He’s also carried the water for the other side on far too numerous occasions. Natzi Pelosi’s loveseat was just one of many incidents where Newt has strayed from the reservation for no apparent reason.


313 posted on 02/11/2012 10:59:37 AM PST by RasterMaster ("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

Does Santorum have the cojones to stand up to 0bama??


314 posted on 02/11/2012 11:00:41 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibsRJerks
You must have missed Newt's speech at CPAC yesterday. He came on right after Santorum had just put them into a catatonic coma. Santorum must have forced them to get a good nap, because Newt electrified them with his first sentence. From that point on, it was another stellar, standing ovation inducing performance.

Newt hit on all of his very solid and well planned solutions to fix this mess, and the there was not one quiet hand in the place.

It was a Grand Slam of speeches, he not only smacked it out of the park, it went into orbit. I don't suspect that Newt will stay down for long, now that he has found his groove again.

It will also be key, that now all the lights are on Santorum, Santorum’s own serious character defects will surely make the electorate fully realize what a mistake they have made in picking him for the moment.

315 posted on 02/11/2012 11:00:50 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

I’m going to presume these poll numbers reflect Republicans or leaning Republicans and it is noteworthy that, in this group, both Romney and Gingrich are as unpopular as they are popular. That’s shocking and, I think, reflects how horrific their negatives would be among voters at large. We know Newt was over 60% negative in a national poll of all voters.

Seems to me that Santorum is the last chance for a conservative to take the nomination and win in the general and that only Santorum and Romney have *any* chance of winning the general. Santorum may be the last best chance to unify the base so that they go into the general with one voice and one message.


316 posted on 02/11/2012 11:05:18 AM PST by OrangeHoof (Obama: The Dr. Kevorkian of the American economy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FresnoRobert
Rick won't take PA. over Newt....that's just not going to happen unless 'the left' keeps pushing Santorum as they're doing now. Don't under estimate Newt's keen ability to play this Primary to his advantage. He is known to lay low and let...as Santorum is doing...things line up...Rick's doing just fine arranging that but he has zip delegates to win him the election or way to attain them since he's not registered in states he would need.....not possible for Santorum. The most he can do is pitch hit with Newt to keep Romney at bay and that's exactly what's happening.

The buzz is even the GOP is willing to take this to a brokered convention to keep Newt from winning....and they've apparently got Jeb Bush hooked up to step forward, though he flatly refused to run in this Primary...this might be the GOP cover if Romney dropped the ball.

That's why Newt has already stated he would indeed stay in this race all the way to the convention...Newt knows what they're up to and is not afraid to face them down there if necessary

317 posted on 02/11/2012 11:05:46 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

We agree on something! :)


318 posted on 02/11/2012 11:06:58 AM PST by LUV W (Unleash the American People!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: bushinohio
He did testify against Gore on the “Cap and Trade” hearings. He has walked much of that back. Not as much as I would like be he has! Newt has always been interested in environmental issues. Has always advocated that there is a conservative position on this and that political playing field should not be ceded to the Rats. If we let that happen there is no counter to Rats claiming that conservatives want dirty water and air. Newt is often too uncritical of environmental claims and claims coming from the academic community even more so. (Remember he does come from that community!). He needs to realize this and be doubly skeptical, particularly since his training is not in the sciences but in history. He needs to realize that he can be conned by “well crafted environmental story”. I think he has been burned enough on it that he is realizing his limitations on that issue and he is now marching down the right path on that.
Now the Fannie & Freddi stuff, he has explained that more then adequately and he did nothing wrong. If you choose to believe otherwise in spite of the facts then too bad! The Dede thing, much of that blame is due to the short comings the local New York State GOP officials. There have been several NY Staters on here who know the local politics and have said how locally corrupt it is. Newt's main problem here was jumping in too quick before he had any facts and he trusted the local GOP mavens. Of course his politician's ego wouldn't let him walk it back before he started to look foolish. The “Reagan era is over” statement was taken out of context. Basically he was arguing that saying Reagan Reagan Reagan like Dorothy (of Oz fame!) tapping her shoes together to leave Oz is not sufficient. Reagan was the greatest expositor of conservative principles in my life time. However he didn't invent them, he stood on the shoulders of giants as did others all the way back to the founding fathers. Conservative need to remember that connection and test candidates in light of that connection with present day issues. Anyway Nancy Reagan did make a public statement saying something about passing the torch to Newt. Newt has zigged & zagged at times with it, but if you average all that out he is still heading in the right Conservative (Reagan-like)direction.
Anyway Reagan wasn't even Reagan his last 2 or 3 years in office! He kind of admits that in his biography, he let himself be conned on a tax increase and on illegal immigration amnesty. Newt was there saw it, and I think has learned from that.

I like Santorum, but he needs to go back and take his Senate seat back. He is not ready for this many of his statements are just conservative platitudes. Now he does have a conservative record unlike Romney who also utters platitudes. I listen to him and I say OK fine I agree and then go back to whatever I was doing nothing grabs me and makes want to go “Over the Top” (To use a WWI saying!). When he is specific they are primarily “half measures”, much better then Romney whose solutions are quarter, 1/8 or 1/16 measures if he evens offers a solution. These just continue to kick the can down the road. The problems we have need bold measures. There are only two candidates that do that Gingrich & Paul. Paul is very very right on some things and very very wrong on others. Unfortunately what he is wrong on is potentially nationally cataclysmic and wipes out his positives. Just about everything Newt cites as national economic problems I have personally either experienced professionally or seen it in action professionally where either a corporation reacts bureaucratically (usually because of USG regulations!)or the USG reacts unthinking bureaucratically.
I don't really care that it took Newt three tries to find apparent marital bliss. I just hope he did. And don't cite Clinton, Clinton's problem was not the sex but lying under oath to a grand jury. (Merely potentially undermines the whole federal grand jury process!)
Maybe Rick later with some more seasoning.

319 posted on 02/11/2012 11:09:27 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Yes I have a problem with the people that have bankrupted the nation and grew government to the point that it has ruined the economy. Not to mention the related loss of individual liberty and the rise of a police state. So I will not be voting for Santorum any time soon.


320 posted on 02/11/2012 11:11:54 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

Romney = Patriots. Santorum = Giants. At least I hope it plays out that way-——sorry you New England fans about the painful analogy.


321 posted on 02/11/2012 11:13:51 AM PST by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tflabo
That's a rather ridiculous comparison. I would say that if Romney equals the Patriots, that Santorum equals the Walla-Walla High School Mallards.
322 posted on 02/11/2012 11:18:17 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof
Santorum is the last chance for a conservative to take the nomination

Orange..impossible and this is why:

Rick will field no delegates In Ill.

He will field none in TN, either.

He is not on the ballot in IN

He is not on the ballot in DC

He is not on the ballot in VA

He will not field any delegates in ND

He is not on the ballot in 20% of OH

He could not even try to compete in the first big state of FL, and has already said as much about CA and NY.

Here’s the bad news:

Delegates are going to be pledged; and no matter how much you beg, they aren't’t going to be assigned to Rick Santorum later just because you really want them to be.... And really, in that above scenario, TN is the only one that assigns them later, anyway....... Rick CANNOT win the nomination. He CANNOT. ...

There is NO PATH to 1140+ delegates for him, period.

(Special acknowledgment to TITANS for his fact finding info and comments)

323 posted on 02/11/2012 11:18:17 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: GoCards; ohioWfan; LuvFreeRepublic; C. Edmund Wright; ez; napscoordinator; writer33; Antoninus; ...
171 posted on Saturday, February 11, 2012 10:36:49 AM by C. Edmund Wright: “I refuse to make my opponent's youth and inexperience an issue in this campaign...”

Best reminder yet! Thanks for posting this, C. Edmund Wright. I remember that line and laughing. I was a Reagan supporter back when virtually everyone in the Michigan Republican Party thought nominating him was the kiss of death and we were headed back toward a Goldwater 1964 experience.

Sound bites work... but if not backed up with detail, the speakers fall on their faces.

290 posted on Saturday, February 11, 2012 12:32:49 PM by C. Edmund Wright: “Note: Chuck Norris is coming out with reasons why he does not support Santorum - Monday in World Net Daily. The irony? Norris will be proven more up to speed on Santorum than Rush. Amazing aint’ it?”

I want to read that. We need to know everything we can about every serious candidate for the Republican nomination.

176 posted on Saturday, February 11, 2012 10:38:25 AM by cripplecreek: “I think Santorum is going to yank the Michigan rug out from under Romney.”

I hope you're right.

I've been out of Michigan for a long time, and my “on-the-ground” contacts are now mostly retired, but social issues conservatives and economic conservatives have worked with the Romney family for so long that this would be a massive blow not only to the Romney campaign but to much of the Republican Party leadership in Michigan.

To give an idea how far I go back, my father was the executive director of the Kent County Republican Party (basically metro Grand Rapids) when Gerald Ford was the House Minority Leader, and then moved to a position on the Republican staff for the Michigan House of Representatives while Ford was in the White House. I saw the chaos caused by the rise of the Christian conservative movement in the 1980s, both as an outsider and then from a different perspective when I was converted myself and left secular politics — a decision that today I believe was a major mistake. Let's just say that I personally grew up with and saw things that made me decide a career in secular politics wasn't what I wanted to do with my life, until I realized the hard way that church politics were far nastier, far more vicious, and more laced with sex scandals and financial scandals than anything I saw growing up in a Republican Party leader's home.

I'm a Calvinist and should have known that total depravity affects church politics as much if not worse than secular politics, but apparently I had to learn that the hard way.

The Michigan Republican Party has leaders who are deeply committed to the Romney family and its brand of a moderate emphasis on family values combined with a big focus on the role of government in economic growth and progress. A Santorum win in Michigan means much more than just delivering Romney what might be a knockout blow — it means major changes in the state's Republican Party are underway or will soon come.

45 posted on Saturday, February 11, 2012 8:54:16 AM by GoCards: “Everyone STOP IT! We are going to win this thing. We want the perfect candidate, isn't going to happen. Buck up and get behind the candidate whomever wins! As far as the “dork” complex of Santorum this could be in our benefit... Dorks are cool too! Calm, boring, patient, loving, is all good things. :)”

53 posted on Saturday, February 11, 2012 9:02:42 AM by ohioWfan: “No one who is unabashedly pro-life is ‘inexperienced’ in the fight against evil. Abortion is the single most demonic issue in our culture, and anyone who strongly stands against it publicly is attacked by Satan himself. Don't underestimate Rick's understanding of evil, nor his willingness to fight it.”

Hey, if the worst thing reasonable people can say about you is you wear a sweater vest, and if the nut-case opponents have made the name Santorum synonymous on the internet with the byproducts of anal gay sex, it's pretty hard to argue you can't fight wild-eyed liberal attacks and come out looking fairly good.

As someone said on another thread: “It's time to FEAR THE VEST!!!”

My goal is to defeat Romney in the primary and Obama in the general. I think Santorum may be the one to do it because he can motivate the conservative Christian base voters, has a fighting shot at winning key industrial swing states, and if Obama keeps up his Catholic-bashing, has a real shot at winning Hispanic Roman Catholic voters.

But if Gingrich ends up being the nominee, that's not the end of the world.

It's too early for anyone to drop out yet. In the northern industrial states, Santorum has a better chance at defeating Romney. In the southern states, it's probably Gingrich who has a better shot at Romney. Let's hope that Santorum and Gingrich can work together to get rid of Romney, and then figure out how to work together to defeat Obama.

131 posted on Saturday, February 11, 2012 9:58:57 AM by C. Edmund Wright: “You make a very important and over looked point. Santorum has NOT been vetted. Consider that Chuck Norris understands Santorum better than Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin do. Why? Santorum has been ignored with Newt and Mitt’s ridiculous obsession with each other. I think I can say with some confidence that as the truth of Santorum’s liberal record comes out, you will see Rush and Levin start to back away from him a bit. But a word of warning to Newt’s folks - you damned well better start getting some of this stuff out there now before Levin and Rush become too invested in their love of Santorum to admit they were wrong.”

125 posted on Saturday, February 11, 2012 9:52:27 AM by LuvFreeRepublic: “I am not out to destroy Santorum. Santorum has not been vetted and he needs to be. If he can't get past conservatives/Republicans he will not get past Obama. FACT.”

I'm not disagreeing that Santorum needs more vetting. While I'm going to delete the swear words, I agree with C. Edmund Wrights’ “word of warning to Newt’s folks (to) start getting some of this stuff out there now before Levin and Rush become too invested in their love of Santorum to admit they were wrong.”

HOWEVER... Santorum has been a national target of the pro-abortionists and the radical gay movement for many, many years. He's also run for office and won office repeatedly in a left-of-center pro-Democrat state. Let's not minimize that. If there were anything **REALLY** horrible in his background, we'd know.

I think whatever gets dug up in the vetting process will be more damaging to Santorum in the Republican primary race than in the general election.

My guess is the worst stuff out there is going to be directly connected with his commitment to Roman Catholicism. Let's be honest here: the Roman Catholic bishops have taken stances which most evangelicals like on abortion and gay marriage, but there are important differences not only with evangelicals but also with secular conservatives on key political issues such as capital punishment and unfettered capitalism.

A practicing Roman Catholic and a conservative evangelical Protestant can't just be lumped into the same group as amorphous “social issues conservatives.” I'm willing to vote for a Roman Catholic, but I do so knowing that the Roman Catholic is condemned by the confessions of my church, is barred from communion in my church as I am barred from taking communion as his, and if faithful to the teachings of his church, he will disagree with me on some very important political issues related to capital punishment and capitalism.

I cannot and will not blame Rick Santorum for being faithful to the teachings of his church. If we want somebody whose church supports family values and unfettered capitalism, that guy's name is neither Gingrich nor Santorum, and that guy's church is based in Utah, not Rome. Sorry, but I'll put up with some Roman Catholic views of “compassionate conservatism” that I don't like rather than deal with Romney's problems.

324 posted on 02/11/2012 11:22:34 AM PST by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: caww

Agreed.


325 posted on 02/11/2012 11:23:09 AM PST by Gene Eric (C'mon, Virginia -- are you with us or against us?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Romney would equal some mascot that has no spine.


326 posted on 02/11/2012 11:24:57 AM PST by Moby Grape (Formerly Impeach the Boy...name change necessary after the Marxist won)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Your reading ability leaves much to be desired.


327 posted on 02/11/2012 11:27:26 AM PST by Lady Lucky (Public education -- government cheese for the brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

Texas doesn’t get to vote for a few months, but I will gladly still vote for Gingrich if he is leading Santorum when the race gets to Texas. But I have no intention of throwing away my vote on Gingrich if he is poll 5% by then and Santorum is in a neck and neck delegate race with Romney at that point. My primary goal is to stop Romney. And voting for someone who has no shot is not much different than voting 3rd party. Hopefully I will have an easy choice either way, it’s the people who live in the next few states that have the hard choice.


328 posted on 02/11/2012 11:30:22 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
I don't suspect that Newt will stay down for long, now that he has found his groove again.

I'm not so sure it's a matter of "groove" as much as Newt's planned strategy.....he was not even being much considered and just layed lowed for a time while he restructured his campaign to come into line as he wanted, not how they wanted. He said that he knew they would have a huge wave ahead but hadn't thought it would be as large as it was.

Also look how he maneuvered with Cain to get the visibility the press was denying him. Newt knows full well all he's up against and said all along his campaign would not be traditional and take many twists and turns. But isn't that how he got things done in Congress as well?

I think Santorum is paving the way and both Newt and Santorum are doing this to keep Romney, media and the left otherwise occupied

I just do not underestimate Newt's strategy....he knows the game and the moves his opposition is making and will pick his fights accordingly....he's flushing out their tactics as well.

It's going to be a ride...hang on!!!! and watch Newt work!!!

329 posted on 02/11/2012 11:30:51 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

?

I support NEWT, so I don’t understand your post.

I speaking about vetting vis a vis 0bama’s lack thereof.

Cain was my guy, though.


330 posted on 02/11/2012 11:31:16 AM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

Another one doesn’t get my drift at all. If you think my posts are harsh, I don’t see how you can bear to log on a place like this. But have a nice day.


331 posted on 02/11/2012 11:32:28 AM PST by Lady Lucky (Public education -- government cheese for the brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

All contributions are for the Current Quarter Expenses.


332 posted on 02/11/2012 11:34:08 AM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster
Stop running with the lefts ammo.....All that stuff has been addressed by Newt...done deal and History. If all you can see is a couch sitting then you haven't done your homework or listened to the numerous scientists, politicians etc. who also changed their tune once the e-mails were out about the hoax.

Additionally Newt spoke to congress opposing Gores work on Global Warming....and still opposes it today....lots of videos to see on that for googling.

So bring yourself up to date instead of pushing the left's talking points.

333 posted on 02/11/2012 11:36:26 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Exactly.


334 posted on 02/11/2012 11:37:03 AM PST by UKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
Santorum is the person at the bottom of everyone’s list of acceptable candidates. He doesn’t stink but doesn’t smell very good either. He’s a career politician who lost his seat in a landslide defeat to one of the dumbest senators in congress today. And unlike Newt, he’s an establishment candidate who endorsed Specter (who voted for Obamacare), and Romney in the primary of ‘08. He’s on record saying he’s against the tea party.

If Santorum meets the standard of being a "career politician" or an "establishment candidate" then certainly Newt does as well - that's embarrassing for you to claim Santorum is but not Gingrich. Specter had not voted for Obamacare in 2004 at the time of the endorsement and had previously been a staunch opponent of nationalized healthcare and was one of the architects in crafting the message that helped to defeat it the previous time it had been tried - with regard to healthcare that was what was on Specter's resume in 2004, not the vote 6 years later. He is not on record as being 'against' the tea party he is on record as being against focusing only on economic issues and leaving other issues by the wayside (i.e. Ron Paul).

335 posted on 02/11/2012 11:39:20 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Lady Lucky

Fair enough, LL. I’ll vote for the Punk’s opponent, no matter who wins. And I can’t STAND Milt. Bob


336 posted on 02/11/2012 11:45:34 AM PST by alstewartfan (27 of 36 of Romney's judicial appointments were DEMOCRATS!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

You had better believe it. Rick will be relentless against the Punk. He will be BEGGING for a return of the lame Juan McCain. Bob


337 posted on 02/11/2012 11:49:11 AM PST by alstewartfan (27 of 36 of Romney's judicial appointments were DEMOCRATS!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Thanks for the thoughtful ping!!


338 posted on 02/11/2012 11:50:21 AM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

I’m with you brother! Time to get real as much as it sucks.


339 posted on 02/11/2012 11:50:34 AM PST by mmanager (Reagan Revolution + Republican Revolution = Bury Obama in 2012 - Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: caww

I don’t understand-—why isn’t Santorum registered in all the states? He’s been running for quite a few months.


340 posted on 02/11/2012 11:52:29 AM PST by Mangia E Statti Zitto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

I see this as a good thing in that the race keeps getting even more interesting. The race this far out might bore people by November but with this being such a horserace it keeps things interesting.


341 posted on 02/11/2012 11:53:37 AM PST by CodeToad (NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

I hate to say it , but I don’t see anyone that is running beating Obama in November. The State of America no longer has any values ,has no morals and most of all no longer fears the lord Jesus Christ. the Muslim will win again and lead American down the road to hell. And at the end of the day it will still be Bush’s fault. You show me a democrat , I will show you A hell bound person.Intrade got Obama winning and over the last two elections they have been right on with everything. I hope I am wrong folks.


342 posted on 02/11/2012 12:00:30 PM PST by MATSEVAH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Has everyone here flunked reading comprehension? Excuse me but if you can’t read the original I’m not going to bother with a special post down level. Don’t like opinions, try a news site.


343 posted on 02/11/2012 12:02:44 PM PST by Lady Lucky (Public education -- government cheese for the brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Not only cannot, but should not win. In a couple of weeks we’ll see why. Public perception of Santorum is largely negative even without vetting; just his image and other superficial factors will ruin his chances. (Truth hurts, Santorum fans; deal with it.) When his opponents begin to examine the details of his career, he will sink like a stone.


344 posted on 02/11/2012 12:08:33 PM PST by Lady Lucky (Public education -- government cheese for the brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Lady Lucky

I read your original post. It sucked.

Santorum is not my favorite so I am not disturbed because you are “dissing” my specific favored candidate. I am disgusted because you are using slimy and dirty tactics to slam a decent candidate by insulting his family and appearances that you see due to your crap colored glasses.

Your “I’m the smartest person on the thread” arrogance is duly noted.


345 posted on 02/11/2012 12:12:34 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

It looks like I’m a three time loser: Cain, Perry, Gingrich.


After the Cainplosion, I studied the rest and chose Santorum. I seriously considered Newt but I couldn’t get over his character / personality flaws. It wasn’t just his past, it was his psychological profile I couldn’t overlook. We need a steady, secure person in the WH.


346 posted on 02/11/2012 12:19:19 PM PST by Yaelle (Go Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

“My main goal is to stop Romney, and Santorum appears to be the only one that can do that.”

My main goal is to stop Obama and Santorum appears not to be the one who can do that.

(Nice man though.)


347 posted on 02/11/2012 12:19:58 PM PST by romanesq (For George Soros so loved the world, he gave us Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

“My main goal is to stop Romney, and Santorum appears to be the only one that can do that.”

My main goal is to stop Obama and Santorum appears not to be the one who can do that.

(Nice man though.)


348 posted on 02/11/2012 12:20:20 PM PST by romanesq (For George Soros so loved the world, he gave us Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

The prancing dandy is Obama. Santorum is all man, and he is at least as conservative as I am.


349 posted on 02/11/2012 12:22:10 PM PST by Yaelle (Go Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: RygelXVI; TexasFreeper2009

I believe that Rick has passed the “electability” test.


350 posted on 02/11/2012 12:25:02 PM PST by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 251-300301-350351-400 ... 451-463 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson