Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This is What a President Looks Like
Townhall.com ^ | February 21, 2012 | John Ransom

Posted on 02/20/2012 7:52:28 PM PST by Kaslin

In an era that lives by self-promotion- an era that takes someone like Donald Trump seriously as a presidential candidate- Presidents' Day is a day to remember that greatness still resides in what one does, not what one claims to be.

That is why Abraham Lincoln will always belong to every age. Because Lincoln was not just a great president; he may have been one of the greatest men that this country has yet produced. His rare combination of self-confidence and humility produced the archetype of "the American, this new man," who is still universally admired.

While many of our heroes have lost their gloss, Abraham Lincoln still shines brightly for many Americans because there is so much to learn from his life.

Lincoln was once criticized over the publication of a private letter he sent to an actor because it dared express Lincoln’s opinion on William Shakespeare. Although Lincoln did not write the letter for public circulation, in those days it was common for private letters to end up in the newspapers.

Lincoln was well-read in Shakespeare. It was evident in the fluidity of much of his writing that he got some of his short, Anglo-Saxon style from Shakespeare. While Lincoln would never match the volume of the Bard, in his own way, Lincoln’s contribution to American letters ranks probably just below Mark Twain’s own accomplishments.

“The novelist William Dean Howell’s claim about his friend Mark Twain,” writes literary biographer Fred Kaplan, “that he was the ‘Lincoln of our literature,’ can effectively be rephrased with the focus on our sixteenth president: Lincoln was the Twain of our politics. Since Lincoln, no president has written his own words and addressed his contemporary audience or posterity with equal and enduring effectiveness.”

Critics, however, thought it pretentious for a man without any formal training in “literature” to express opinions about Shakespeare.

As a consequence of elitist criticism, Lincoln gave us this enduring gem, precisely balanced on the pen point of Shakespearean grace: “I have endured a great deal of ridicule without much malice; and have received a great deal of kindness, not quite free from ridicule. I am used to it."

Indeed, during Lincoln’s life he was ridiculed over his origins, (from a log-cabin); his looks (he described himself as “homely”); his lack of formal education (he was mostly self-taught); his wife (who could be quite arrogant, aggressive, and at times clinically crazy); and a great deal besides.

Probably no President dealt with as much abuse as Lincoln. Yet throughout his life Lincoln rarely struck back at his critics. He maintained, instead, a firm confidence about who he was, avoiding all pretense of superiority even when he knew he was right.

“What a sharpshooter’s bead he could draw in one sentence,” the Chicago poet and Lincoln biographer, Carl Sandburg said in The Wit and Wisdom of Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Edition.

Sandburg relates that once Lincoln’s Secretary of State, William Seward- who was hoping to win the presidential nomination that Lincoln wrangled for himself- offered to put a Lincoln dispatch to the English government “couched in more diplomatic terms.”

Then," said Secretary of War Stanton, "came the demonstration. The President, half wheeling in his seat, threw one leg over the chair-arm, and, holding the letter in his hand, said, 'Seward, do you suppose Palmerston will understand our position from that letter, just as it is?'

"'Certainly, Mr. President.'

"'Do you suppose the London Times will?'

"'Certainly.'

"'Do you suppose the average Englishman of affairs will?'

"'Certainly; it cannot be mistaken in England.'

"'Do you suppose that a hackman out on his box will understand it?'

"'Very readily, Mr. President.'

"'Very well, Seward, I guess we'll let her slide just as she is.'

The lack of artfulness helped Lincoln turn critics, like Secretary of War Edwin Stanton and Secretary Seward from scoffers into supporters.

“Executive force and vigor are rare qualities,” Seward wrote his wife. “The President is the best of us.”

In 1855 Lincoln was hired to represent Cyrus McCormick who was claiming patent infringement against a defendant. In addition, McCormick retained a number of better established lawyers from the eastern US, including Edwin M. Stanton. As the trial commenced in Cincinnati, the other attorneys ignored Lincoln, shutting him out of the case with Stanton going so far as to call Lincoln “that damned long armed ape,” within his hearing. Lincoln swallowed his pride and watched the trial from the courtroom with other spectators.

When McCormick later sent Lincoln a check for his services on the case, Lincoln returned the check explaining that he really hadn’t done anything to earn it.

When the client returned the check to Lincoln and insisted that he cash the check, Lincoln again swallowed his pride and cashed the check despite his grumbling about the “rough” treatment he got from Stanton. But he never struck back at Stanton. In fact, in Stanton he recognized administrative qualities that could be useful to him

That’s why Lincoln later picked Stanton to become his Secretary of War after the resignation of Simon Cameron, a crooked politician from Pennsylvania. At the time of his selection Stanton was still an avowed critic of Lincoln. Lincoln was willing to overlook this because of Stanton’s superb managerial skills. As their relationship matured Stanton became one of Lincoln’s warmest admirers.

Stanton was in the room when Lincoln died, just across from Ford’s Theatre. Stanton gave Lincoln the most fitting of all epitaphs upon his passing: "Now he belongs to the ages."

I still can’t read those words without awe at the full measure of devotion that Lincoln continues to give our country.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abrahamlincoln
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 02/20/2012 7:52:37 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Lincoln certainly did not waffle on the question of whether it’s constitutionally permissible for states to abandon the union. But some rednecks (and I say to all rednecks: be proud of that neck) and Southrons [sic] even yet beg to disagree with what went down. The fact that chattel slavery based on kidnapped slaves and racial bigotry was heavily tied up in the economies of a lot of the South doesn’t make them look all that good (and I would wholeheartedly agree with theologians who aver that the South was cruising for a divine bruising on that matter and that the Civil War was probably it), but Lincoln being less than totally altruistic didn’t free the Northern slaves together with the Southern ones but waited. It is a checkered history. Still, it’s sad that the Republican party in the Land of Lincoln is a faint shadow of its old idealistic self.


2 posted on 02/20/2012 8:01:07 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

and today SNL would be doing skits on how ugly he was...The MSM would be doing story after story on his crazy wife....and he would never win


3 posted on 02/20/2012 8:04:25 PM PST by skaterboy (Hate=Love....Love=Hate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Moonman62

The Civil War certainly became a bigger issue than just “quit shooting and give us back the Federal property and then go your way in peace.”

Fremont was a child molester... who knew.


5 posted on 02/20/2012 8:18:19 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Lincoln being less than totally altruistic didn’t free the Northern slaves together with the Southern ones

But he did try to promote a plan of compensated emancipation in the Union slave states which was rejected.

6 posted on 02/20/2012 8:22:13 PM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy
and today SNL would be doing skits on how ugly he was...The MSM would be doing story after story on his crazy wife....and he would never win

True, but consider this really odd coincidence: somebody has decided that Abraham Lincoln would make for a good action hero and they are spending a lot of money to do so:

Abraham Lincoln : Vampire Hunter

Official Trailer (released last week)

Comes out in June of this year. Seems silly as hell, but they are making it serious. Johnny Cash's spoken Revelation bit from 'The Man Comes Around' in the the trailer helps sell it.

I loathe Fox and anything associated with Rupert Murdoch, but I'm going to have to see this one on opening weekend.
7 posted on 02/20/2012 8:23:00 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

Sounds better than Twilight


8 posted on 02/20/2012 8:30:28 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I disagree with the characterization of Lincoln as “humble.” People of great intellect are never really humble. For example, Lincoln was once asked about why he almost never read newspaper accounts of the war. His answer was along the lines of “Why should I? I know more than they do.”

I think that in Lincoln’s case the humble bit was a clever political ploy.


9 posted on 02/20/2012 8:33:18 PM PST by OldPossum (ou)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
When I cry for this nation which is our “Constitution and Bill of Rights”, Mr Lincoln tops that list. The loss of states rights has done as much damage as allowing people to vote who do not pay taxes. Lincoln was not a great President. Not even close. He nearly destroyed the greatest nation God has allowed to exist in 1865. Today the absence of states rights may still doom us and will be the scumbag Lincoln's true legacy.
10 posted on 02/20/2012 8:46:03 PM PST by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberty or death

Lincoln nearly destroyed the Union?

What do you think would’ve happened if the Confederacy had succeeded?

France almost conquered Mexico in 1863 (cinco de Mayo) as it was.

North America would look just like South America, a collection of poverty-stricken 3rd world hell-holes. None of us would even be here now.


11 posted on 02/20/2012 8:54:45 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Ouch!


12 posted on 02/20/2012 8:55:12 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: liberty or death

It was the 16th and 17th Amendments more than all else combined that eviscerated states rights.


13 posted on 02/20/2012 9:00:37 PM PST by Hostage (The revolution needs a spark. The Constitution is dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum

Sounds to me like he was just telling the truth. He WOULD know more about the war than the press.


14 posted on 02/20/2012 9:06:44 PM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it's the new black. Mmm mmm mmm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

Sounds like a great double-bill with Iron Sky, if it could be arranged.

I’d escape reality for long afternoon or evening to see those.


15 posted on 02/20/2012 9:18:48 PM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ReneeLynn; OldPossum
Sounds to me like he was just telling the truth.

Lincoln spent many, many hours in the telegraph office in Washington getting the latest info from his commanders in the field. There was very little the press could have added.

16 posted on 02/20/2012 9:18:48 PM PST by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin


Our generation's Lincoln
17 posted on 02/20/2012 9:30:08 PM PST by wjcsux ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Thank you. A nice read on President’s Day.


18 posted on 02/20/2012 9:35:29 PM PST by starsstripesflags
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
It was the 16th and 17th Amendments more than all else combined that eviscerated states rights.
Exactly! Enacted by President Woodrow Wilson!
19 posted on 02/20/2012 9:39:22 PM PST by wjcsux ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum

I disagree that “people of great intellect” are “never really humble.” I think intellects have their fair share of pompous asses and salt of the earth people just like every other group or category of folks out there.


20 posted on 02/20/2012 9:42:39 PM PST by starsstripesflags
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson