Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah

And somehow that is supposed to define small-l libertarians. Gotcha, Mr. Truth.


112 posted on 02/21/2012 3:11:37 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck
What's your problem? All the libertarians large or small I've encountered are merely on the continuum of the agenda of the Libertarian Party. If anyone disagrees with the LP agenda (such as pro-all drugs legalized, legal abortion, legal prostitution, all "gay" rights okay, all porn legal with no holds barred, etc) then why do they call themselves libertarian?

I used to think I agreed with a large part of libertarianism until I educated myself about the LP platform. And if "small l" libertarians don't agree with the LP, why don't they think of another description. I call my self a Constitutionalist.

Your snide remarks do not enhance honest debate, btw. Oh, just saw this comment you made:

Individual libertarians have staked out quite self-consistent positions.

ROTFLOL! I haven't seen anything as funny in a long time. Not only are they not consistent, other than consistently lie and misrepresent their real views, but internally their view cancel each other out. Just like bvw - thinks forced abortion is fine, yet supposedly is all about "freedom" and "liberty".

126 posted on 02/21/2012 4:45:23 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson