Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems propose 'Reasonable Profits Board' to regulate oil company profits
The Hill ^ | 3/1/12 | Pete Kasperowicz

Posted on 03/01/2012 3:39:35 PM PST by ColdOne

Six House Democrats, led by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), want to set up a "Reasonable Profits Board" to control gas profits.

The Democrats, worried about higher gas prices, want to set up a board that would apply a "windfall profit tax" as high as 100 percent on the sale of oil and gas, according to their legislation. The bill provides no specific guidance for how the board would determine what constitutes a reasonable profit.

The Gas Price Spike Act, H.R. 3784, would apply a windfall tax on the sale of oil and gas that ranges from 50 percent to 100 percent on all surplus earnings exceeding "a reasonable profit." It would set up a Reasonable Profits Board made up of three presidential nominees that will serve three-year terms. Unlike other bills setting up advisory boards, the Reasonable Profits Board would not be made up of any nominees from Congress.

The bill would also seem to exclude industry representatives from the board, as it says members "shall have no financial interests in any of the businesses for which reasonable profits are determined by the Board."

According to the bill, a windfall tax of 50 percent would be applied when the sale of oil or gas leads to a profit of between 100 percent and 102 percent of a reasonable profit. The windfall tax would jump to 75 percent when the profit is between 102 and 105 percent of a reasonable profit, and above that, the windfall tax would be 100 percent. The bill also

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: fasciststate; iran; iranlobby; kucinich; marxiststate; oilindustry; profitsboard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: ADemocratNoMore; Aggie Mama; alarm rider; alexander_busek; AlligatorEyes; AmericanGirlRising; ...

Again, I don’t normally ping the “Atlas” list for a simple news item, but this one is right out of Wesley Mouch’s office.


21 posted on 03/01/2012 3:59:47 PM PST by Publius (Tagline for rent. Reasonable rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Oh yeah, that will REALLY help us increase our domestic production. These people have $hit for brains.


22 posted on 03/01/2012 4:00:18 PM PST by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I don’t think that the profit made by an oil company on a gallon of gasoline should exceed the taxes paid on that same gallon of gasoline.


23 posted on 03/01/2012 4:02:26 PM PST by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

That’ll help those gas prices.

After they eliminate depletion allowance and Intangible Drilling Costs.

Yep, that’ll help those gas prices.

God, please let whoever wins the GOP nomination articulate the real facts in a manner even the entitlement population can understand.

Oil & Gas = real jobs

Green = Solyndra, windmills, unicorns


24 posted on 03/01/2012 4:02:48 PM PST by justapicker (I don't want the cheese, I just want out of the trap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
I read though the article and fail to see how taxing windfall profits would lower prices at the pump since the oil companies have no incentive to made a lower margin...if everything over reasonable profits is taxed just how does that lower prices?

Only democrats have such asshats assumptions

25 posted on 03/01/2012 4:03:32 PM PST by Popman (America is squandering its wealth on riotous living, war, and welfare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Wasn’t this called the “Anti-dog-eat-dog bill” in the book?


26 posted on 03/01/2012 4:07:32 PM PST by ponygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2

Apple Computer has had a nice run up and most of their product comes from China, and I sold.


27 posted on 03/01/2012 4:07:32 PM PST by DUMBGRUNT (The best is the enemy of the good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

How many times does this scenario have to play out before people “get it”?


28 posted on 03/01/2012 4:09:25 PM PST by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Is there going to be a reasonable profits panel for Apple, Google and berkshire Hathaway as well?


29 posted on 03/01/2012 4:10:56 PM PST by jersey117 (The Stepford Media should be sued for malpractice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

Whuuut? Sounds like Dennis and the Dems think only Congress Critters get to “vote” on stuff like this.

LOL .... Okay, I’m ready. Hit me with your best shot, Dennis! I’ll “vote” that I need a vacation. I’ll run the wells every other month, “play” when they are down, and (I bet) STILL make as much money as I do now, because you’re “bright idea” will spike crude prices out of sight.

I’m pretty sure that I won’t be alone & We’ll just see who folds first. :)

Pass this bill! I Double Dog Dare ya!


30 posted on 03/01/2012 4:13:06 PM PST by OkiMusashi (Beware the fury of a patient man. --- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

How about we lower the federal tax on gasoline first if we really care about “American families”?


31 posted on 03/01/2012 4:17:53 PM PST by machman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

OMG bump!


32 posted on 03/01/2012 4:20:03 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ponygirl
Nope. Anti-dog prevented one company from taking over another in the same or a related industry. Anti-dog is why Rearden had to cancel his option on and intended purpose of buying Fleming's copper property.

This piece of crap is more along the lines of the "Railroad Unification Bill", except that it doesn't have the goobermint setting **prices** directly, only profits. "Only" profits. As if there's any significant distinction over the medium term, eh? Sheesh.

33 posted on 03/01/2012 4:20:39 PM PST by SAJ (What is the next tagline some overweening mod will censor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

And will this make the price we pay for gas go down?
No
Congress is corrupt


34 posted on 03/01/2012 4:21:53 PM PST by funfan (and his crew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

I was just going to ask if this was the early release of Part II.


35 posted on 03/01/2012 4:24:25 PM PST by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
We are getting what we deserve.

36 posted on 03/01/2012 4:30:17 PM PST by I see my hands (It's time to.. KICK OUT THE JAMS, MOTHER FREEPERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
“Six House Democrats, led by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), want to set up a “Reasonable Profits Board” to control gas profits.”

We the People have elected fools. We should be ashamed. FYI, CongressmenDumbA$$es, the more the Oil Companies make the more taxes you DumbA$$es collect.

Chgogal and five neighbors would like to set up a “Reasonable Spending Board” to control federal spending. Me thinks Congressman Mike Quiggley will get a call tomorrow.

37 posted on 03/01/2012 4:32:13 PM PST by Chgogal (WSJ, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Here ya go, Dennis, try this idea - REDUCE the federal taxes on gas and oil. The government didn’t assume any risk in drilling; the government didn’t assume any risk in transporting the oil; the government didn’t asume any risk in refining the oil into gas; but the government consumes upwards of $0.50/gal in taxes for each gallon of gas sold.

By contrast, the oil companies get somewhere between $0.11 and $0.15 per gallon.

Sooooooooo, who should have to reduce their profit from the sale of gas???

(Since I know you aren’t too sharp, Dennis, here’s a hint - it SHOULDN’T be the oil companies!!)


38 posted on 03/01/2012 4:35:01 PM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - Another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Just in case some misunderstand my post, the more you tax the less you get.


39 posted on 03/01/2012 4:35:05 PM PST by Chgogal (WSJ, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

What we are seeing is communism in action.
These guys should be hung for even suggesting
such a thing.


40 posted on 03/01/2012 4:37:18 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson