Posted on 03/03/2012 8:15:02 AM PST by null and void
When does 0bama give a speech stating:
"It's not perfect but without it it would be MUCH worse"?
lol The concept of this "technological wonder" is well over 100 years old. There was a REASON manufacturers went with gasoline powered engines back then. Those same reasons apply today. The objective of the liberals today is to distort the markets to a point where gasoline is cost prohibitive compared to electricity. They are going to turn the world upside down to make this happen. This is going to TOTALLY screw those of us living in rural areas. They don't give a rat's ass about us anyway. We don't fit within their grand vision of America. The liberals will just tell us to move to the cities.
There just isnt a market for it today.>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I agree, no market for the Volt, for a vehicle that catches fire or its charging stations catch fire.
Its a multi thousand dollar match stick. I definitely think Obama should drive one several hours each day. Maybe we would get lucky.
Lee noted that sales of the Volt were higher in February than they were in January, and added that California recently decided to allow the electric car to qualify for High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes in the state.
I saw a Volt state propaganda release and they called the Volt, the Extended Range Volt.
Is there a new version where they did something to the car so it goes farther on batteries or is this merely an advertizing weasel word?
Uuuuhhh, is the generator solar powered or wind powered? Curious minds want to know the details....:)))
Its an Albatross car.
Absolutely everything Obama has backed, or endorsed has or is about to fail.
Actually, that is code language to Obammie the Commie that he has to drive up gas-at-the-pump even higher if he wants to force Americans to drive this garbage (or opt for public(ly-funded) transportation)
I understand that the real reason to close the plant - and it’s only temporary - is to re-tool the plant for better fireproofing.
Reminds me of Jesse Racist Jackson with his stupid, “Keep hope alive Keep hope alive Keep hope alive Keep hope alive Keep hope alive Keep hope alive Keep hope alive”.
Reminds me of a picture of another dork riding in a tank.
Actually this piece of junk is a hybrid and you wouldn't need to stop at all, the car would simply switch to the small gas engine, thus becoming a CO2 polluting machine along with all the other gas burning cars on the road(no need for sarc tag there I don't think). This car does not get the so called mileage it claims for the simple fact that if you want to take a major trip you will be on Gas most of the way. Say you want to take a long road trip, one that would take at least two days to get there. That would mean running on gas for all but the first 25-40 miles on the first day and when you stopped for the night there would be no charging station waiting for you so it would be all Gas on the second day and probably all gas on the return trip also.
This electric car BS is just that, BS, until such times as really good batteries are invented, which my never happen. Even so, there is really very little advantage with electricity since it has to be generated with some type of fuel for the most part, in order to charge the batteries.
Electric cars are the invention of the left to try and force US citizens to give up their freedom to travel where ever they wish in their gas powered cars.
San Fagsisco has too many hills for the Chevy Dolt.
That would be the ‘Real World’ Volt that gets 25 miles on a battery charge instead of the 40 miles claimed. The Volt is the perfect example of a government program whereby one cannot pickup a turd by the clean end.
Last year, one of the UK papers decided to replicate the 19th century London-Glasgow Express Coach (pulled by horses) run using a cutting-edge 21st century electric car. The distance is slightly less than 400 miles. The horse-drawn coach took two days (including 1-1/2 hours to change teams every 20-25 miles). The EV took four days with 9 recharging stops averaging 8 hours. We certainly got a demonstration of 21st century technology and progress — didn't we?
It is not practical. SF has lots of hills, and lots of stop and go traffic. That stated 35mpg would probably equate to 20mpg or less in SF. In the last couple years, I have only seen one Volt in SF. There are lots of Priuses and other hybrids that cost less than half the price of the Volt in SF. People here tend to go for compact cars that fit in tiny parking spots, as parking is scarce. The money you save by not buying a Volt can fill a lot of parking meters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.