Posted on 03/04/2012 6:55:17 PM PST by U-238
We need to keep in mind, China has what is commonly referred to as a "deterrent" force. Russia and the US have what is commonly referred to as a "MAD" force, (Mutally Assured Destruction). I've read estimates between 800-1500 ICBM's, each, vs China's, maybe 50 or so. And double that amount by 2025. Which would still put them at significantly less than either the US or Russia.
I find it ironic, that the American public, no longer fears Russia's capability, but seem to focus on China's. But I personally fear Russia more and feel Russia would more likely use weapons of mass destruction than the Chinese.
It only makes sense, that Russia would likely use her force long before China. China has a growing conventional force. China is more plugged into the global economy and more dependent than Russia for global resources. And China's financial system is slowly integrating into the West. There is no need for China to resort to nuclear force, but only as an absolute last resort.
Russia on the other hand, is a super power based soley on her nuclear arsenel. That is her ace in the hole.
So, once again, I do find it ironic that few seem to fear Russia.
I agree with your thesis. Russia is still a danger.
Thanks, I appreciate your honesty.
No problem!!
Thanks U-238.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.