To: ansel12
"Not a very convincing argument you have there." I am not trying to convince anybody. You made the statement that there is no difference between ZERO and Mitt.
There is a lot of difference.
I am not pleased with the choices we have left.
I will vote for the Republican nominee even if it's Paul.
12 posted on
03/05/2012 12:32:39 PM PST by
DeaconRed
(Thanks ZERO, Thanks a lot. I have a broken bank account that's all I got. My apologies to E. Tubb)
To: Voter#537; ansel12
I am not trying to convince anybody. You made the statement that there is no difference between ZERO and Mitt. There is a lot of difference.
Please provide a list.
13 posted on
03/05/2012 12:36:39 PM PST by
Eaker
(Remember, the enemy tends to wise up at the least convenient moments.)
To: Voter#537
You made the statement that there is no difference between ZERO and Mitt. You are confusing me with another poster.
I pointed out that telling people to "google" information for why you are defending Romney, is not a very convincing argument for you.
14 posted on
03/05/2012 12:41:55 PM PST by
ansel12
(Santorum-Catholic and "I was basically pro-choice all my life, until I ran for Congress" he said))
To: Voter#537; ansel12
You made the statement that there is no difference between ZERO and Mitt. ansel12 didn't say that, I did but I misspoke and now admit it. Romney is much worse than Obama.
Romney denies he's 100% liberal and that's a lie.
Yes I will once again take hold of my nose and vote for him.
Spoken like a true blue republican. Too bad this isn't a republican forum.
17 posted on
03/05/2012 1:06:53 PM PST by
Graybeard58
(Eccl 10 v. 19 A feast is made for laughter, and wine maketh merry: but money answereth all things.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson