Posted on 03/06/2012 4:28:04 PM PST by wagglebee
The new Obama mandate that requires religious groups to pay for birth control and drugs that may cause abortions for their employees could result in fines as much as $2,000 per employee or $100 each day if they refuse to comply. Recently, Republicans in Congress asked the Congressional Research Service to examine the new mandate and the consequences for employers that do not want to follow it because it would violate their consciences and CRS issued a document finding noncompliant employers could face federal fines of $100 per day per employee. “If a group health plan or health insurance issuer failed to provide contraceptive services pursuant to guidelines authorized by ACA, it seems possible … that a plan participant could be able to bring a claim for that benefit,” the memo states.
The report indicates the IRS is empowered to levy a tax penalty on noncompliant religious employers of $100 per day for each employee in their health plan.
“A group health plan that fails to comply with the pertinent requirements in the IRC may be subject to a tax of $100 for each day in the noncompliance period with respect to each individual to whom such failure relates. However, if failures are not corrected before a notice of examination for tax liability is sent to the employer, and these failures occur or continue during the period under examination, the penalty will not be less than $2,500. Where violations are considered to be more than de minimis, the amount will not be less than $15,000.”
Commerce Committee Republicans, according to Politico, are not happy with the findings. “Implementing a federal mandate that violates the conscience of an individual or organization, regardless of their religious affiliation or organizational purpose, is in direct violation with the First Amendment,” the committee said in a release announcing the report. “Imposing a fine on these individuals pours salt in the wound.” They said, according to Politico, that a charity or hospital with 100 employees “chooses to exercise its religious rights instead of complying with the Obamacare mandate, it could be subject to a $3.65 million annual fine.
Hannah Smith, Senior Legal Council of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, spoke with Zenit yesterday about the fines and said most religious employers would not be exempt from the mandate: Back in August, the Department of Health and Human Services issued the mandate which requires all group health plans in the United States to pay for contraception, sterilization, and certain drugs that can cause an abortion. That mandate contains a very narrow exemption, and the exemption would permit a very few number of churches and religious orders to be exempted from its requirements. The exemption from the mandate has four prongs: the religious employer must (1) have the primary purpose of inculcating religious values, (2) primarily employ people of its own faith, (3) primarily serve people of its own faith, and (4) fall within a certain tax-code provision (that it’s tax exempt, and it doesn’t have to file tax returns in the United States). So, it is a very narrow exemption that basically means very few religious entities will be exempted from the mandate. Most faith-based institutions, like schools, universities, colleges, soup kitchens, homeless shelters, or other social service organizations would not be exempt from the mandate. That’s why the mandate has set off such a public outcry, because there are so many religious organizations that, because of their religious mission, could not cover these kinds of drugs and services, but under the mandate there is no opportunity for them to opt out. It’s important to remember that religious institutions that do not comply with this mandate will be fined roughly $2,000 per employee, which means that for most of our clients they will pay hundreds of thousands of dollars per year if they do not comply with this mandate. That kind of substantial burden on religious exercise is impermissible in the American legal system. The subject of fines for religious groups come up last week at a Congressional hearing on the mandate.
Asma Uddin, an attorney with The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, told the Judiciary Committee of the United States House of Representatives, “For example, a charitable organization with 100 employees will have to pay the federal government $140,000 per year for the “privilege” of not underwriting medical services it believes are immoral.”
“Given these coercive burdens on the religious freedom of organizations and individuals that hold religious beliefs against contraception and/or abortion, the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty has brought several lawsuits. The lawsuits, each of which make the same claims, are on behalf of (1) Belmont Abbey College (BAC), a Catholic liberal arts college founded by Benedictine monks; (2) Colorado Christian University (CCU), an interdenominational Christian college; (3) Eternal Word Television Network (EWTN), a television network that serves to spread Catholic teachings; and (4) Ave Maria University, a Catholic University dedicated to transmitting authentic Catholic values to students,” she continued. “For failing to comply by the Mandate, BAC would pay approximately $340,000 annually, CCU would pay $500,000; EWTN would pay $620,000; and Ave Maria close to $340,000.”
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Thats’ all Obama has, Threats, Fines, Taxation and Prison.
What a guy ?????????
Thats’ all Obama has, Threats, Fines, Taxation and Prison.
What a guy ?????????
What happened to “if you like your health plan, you can keep it”
President Obama Sept. 2009 Joint session of congress
I guess he must have read all those minds ....
Isn’t that what this administration is all about anyway. We have come a long way baby.
So what happens if the institutions do not pay the fine?
Do the police come and permanently seal the facility? Because without a permanent seal, the owners can just come back the day after the police come and reopen.
The pertinent question here is under what authority does this president-usurper assume such authority? Since when does any President have the authority to unilaterally impose fines on legitimate organizations for whatever reasons he, and only he, sees fit? Has the Constitution officially been declared null and void? WTF people? King George III was a saint compared to this steaming pile of obama...
Why not? That's what the green police already do to homeowners who pump their septics more than the yearly limit - they lock them out of their houses.
The "Regime" will likely have to hire more police to enforce their diktats. And perhaps open more courts to process the "criminals" who refuse to pay for other people's birth control or subsidize infanticide.
“King George III was a saint compared to this steaming pile of obama...”
That’s a fact.
He an absolute ruler. Better get used to calling this communists black Muslim your King.
I would imagine this leads him to pleasure himself repeatedly as he dwells on it.
The President is a pervert.
say no. do not follow it. refuse to obey mandates (not even a law??) that violate your conscience (let’s not get into my tax money paying to kill the unborn... my head starts to explode at the thought of how many I’ve killed with my tax money over the years)
additionally, all conservatives should do the following:
1. stop associating with progressives
2. if you determine someone is a progressive in an interview... do not hire them
3. if you find a progressive in your work place, stop associating and attempt to push them to a dying branch of the company
progressives have been doing it for years... its time we return the favor. and since we outnumber them, it’ll hurt
The management at those Catholic institutions should send letters to all of their employees and tell them to update their resumes and start looking for another job. Send out the letters next September.
And notice the silence of the lambs .... er, Congress.
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
say no. do not follow it. refuse to obey mandates
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I second that motion. Do not obey Mr. Obama’s little rules, refuse to comply, stick it in his eye. Does L’il Barry REALLY want to start arresting Roman Catholic Bishops and Priests for refusing to obey?
Regardless of the election outcome, or how far Mr. Ozero decides to push his dictate, I am imagining a swarm of patriots crossing the Potomoc, to the grounds of the National Mall headed North and East, reminiscent of Lord Of the Rings where Helms Deep was saved by the onslaught of the dead warriors.
“STAND, MEN OF THE WEST !!! “
Aragorn Elessar’s “Stand Men of the West!”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=AWp4W-PBLkw
If they come to seal Church property , they may find a few Thousand Catholics waiting for them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.