Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hollywood's Sarah Palin: ‘Yes, I’m a Liberal Democrat’
CNSNews.com ^ | Harrington | Elizabeth

Posted on 03/09/2012 12:13:15 PM PST by CNSNews.com

On the red carpet Thursday before the preview of the HBO film “Game Change,” actess Julianne Moore, who plays Sarah Palin in the film, said she did not want to talk about politics before declaring herself a "liberal Democrat" who supports President Barack Obama.

CNSNews.com asked Moore: "Are there any public policy issues that you agree with Sarah Palin on?"

Moore said, “You know, I’m leaving politics out of this. And she’s [Palin] not a political figure right now, I mean, I think she’s a--right now--she’s a correspondent for Fox News, so.”

CNSNews.com then asked: “What about President Obama, do you agree with some of his policy positions?”

Moore, laughing, said, “Yes. I’m a Liberal Democrat. So, yes.”

Moore also said it was “fascinating” to play the conservative Palin in the film and added that she tried to be as accurate as possible in her portrayal.

“Game Change,” which premieres on the cable channel HBO on March 10, chronicles the Sen. John McCain's selection of the former Alaska governor as his running mate on the 2008 Republican presidential ticket.

When asked what it was like to play Sarah Palin, Moore said, “It was fascinating. It really, really was. I mean, I think whenever you’re playing a living figure, let alone a historically and culturally significant one, you have a tremendous responsibility to be as accurate as possible, to be as true as possible.”

“So it was a daunting task,” Moore said. “I had--fortunately, everything is documented. I have a lot of things to draw on. There’s YouTube, all the books. And I really just tried to work within those parameters and be true within the characterization.”

Moore did not meet with Palin before portraying her for the film, though she said Director Jay Roach reached out to Palin for a meeting before filming. Palin, Moore said, declined the meeting. “So we knew she didn’t want to be involved,” said Moore.

The HBO film has been criticized by aides to Sarah Palin and Sen. McCain has described it as inaccurate. “It's based on a book that is full of unattributed quotes, things that absolutely never happened and, if it's based on that book, which I was briefed on, then, of course, it can't be accurate," McCain said on Monday.

The senator’s wife, Cindy McCain, told CNN, "I lived this. And from everything I've read and heard, it doesn't even resemble what took place. I can go to Disneyland for fiction.”

HBO defended the movie as “a balanced portrayal of the McCain-Palin campaign.”

“If the book was very misleading, the movie’s going to be far worse,” Palin adviser Randy Scheunemann said during a conference call Wednesday. “It gives fiction a bad name to call this fiction.”

“Game Change” was adapted from the book of the same name by journalists Mark Halperin and John Heilemann.

Palin’s story as the vice presidential nominee plays only a minor part in the book, which also details the heated primary battle between then Democratic candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Moore, along with Roach and Halperin, walked the red carpet for the film’s preview at the Newseum in Washington, D.C. on Thursday night, March 8.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hbo; sarahpalin

1 posted on 03/09/2012 12:13:19 PM PST by CNSNews.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com
Palin, Moore said, declined the meeting. “So we knew she didn’t want to be involved,” said Moore.

I can't imagine why.

And I still can't get over Julianne Moore as Sarah Palin. There were no hot actresses available? They went with Maude Lebowski?

2 posted on 03/09/2012 12:18:22 PM PST by Future Snake Eater (Don't stop. Keep moving!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com

Dumb wench. She did the money for 2 reasons. Money and it trashes Sarah Palin. She got a “2fer”. If she’s a “liberal democrat” andn she’s so caring of her fellow human beings, how much of that money will go toward any type of charity?


3 posted on 03/09/2012 12:18:35 PM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com

You are a genetic liberal democrat, Julianne, you may as well have stupid tatooed on your forehead.


4 posted on 03/09/2012 12:19:46 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com

Julianne Moore is a “dumb tw@t(TM).”


5 posted on 03/09/2012 12:22:46 PM PST by FroggyTheGremlim (Conservative patriots, Rise up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com

She is wrong. She is a leftist democrat.


6 posted on 03/09/2012 12:28:27 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

Mentally challenged, as all Follywood Libs are.


7 posted on 03/09/2012 12:31:50 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com
So Julianne Moore supports punishing America for our greatness, our sacrifice in defeating communism and all the technological contribution we have given to the world.

There are two kinds of democrats:
Those who want to punish or destroy America and those who passively aid them with their votes.

8 posted on 03/09/2012 12:34:06 PM PST by Baynative (Please check this out - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFIcZkEzc8I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com

Another liberal fluke doin’ it for the money...


9 posted on 03/09/2012 12:35:02 PM PST by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com

Actress. Check.

Low IQ. Check.

No education to speak of. Check.

Liberal dim-bulb-crat. Check.

Nothing to see here...move along, move along.


10 posted on 03/09/2012 12:52:59 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com
If she support BHO then why is she living in the West Village in New York city in a multi-million dollar condo? Oh that's right, Marxist socialism only applies to the other rich people.
11 posted on 03/09/2012 12:55:53 PM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (How ironic that Ann Coulter should write a book called Treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com
Moore also said it was “fascinating” to play the conservative Palin in the film and added that she tried to be as accurate as possible in her portrayal.

You are about as *accurate* in your 'art', Julianne, as that other Moore, Michael, which is to say, a complete phony. You likely believe, as an article of faith, that Tina Fey's parody of Governer Palin was accurate as well, when it was most certainly not, so shut yer piehole...

the infowarrior

12 posted on 03/09/2012 12:57:53 PM PST by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com
This movie is a top example of the Hollywood propaganda con game. Every single leading cast member is a raging Left winger: Ed Harris, Julianne Moore, Woody Harrelson. The Hollywood Reporter noted that the film's top talent and executives donated US$200,000 to Democratic causes and none to Republicans. Yet they try to convince viewers their presentation is honest and objective. Sadly, many suckers believe it!

HBO as we all know is totally in the tank for Democrats/Progressives/Marxists, featuring rabid leftists like Bill Maher. It's owned by Time-Warner, the huge liberal company not known for being kind to conservatives.

Why do people keep falling for this stuff? People still complain about film maker Leni Riefenstahl being in the tank for Hitler. What we see happening now via massive left wing media control is a million times more dangerous to liberty and freedom.

13 posted on 03/09/2012 1:33:57 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com

HBO movie producers took a book Sarah Palin says is not accurate but didn’t use it much for the movie anyway, just the title. Instead, they added to and drastically altered the book’s story line. HBO producers did not obtain permission from the real-life human beings who HBO was going to portray in a manner against their wishes. Thus, Game Change became a major-league hit piece with intent to denigrate Sarah Palin and other parties.

Tell me again why this is not actionable in court and why the Palins cannot receive damages from HBO, home to Bill Maher.

Why is this not slander against Sarah Palin? Can HBO portray anyone they want anyway they like against that person’s wishes?


14 posted on 03/09/2012 1:35:54 PM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com

Like Klansmen being in charge of portraying the life of Martin Luther King Jr.


15 posted on 03/09/2012 1:52:55 PM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com

bttt


16 posted on 03/09/2012 6:55:25 PM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CNSNews.com
Like that was a surprise.....Ed Harris as McCain, Woody Harrelson as Schmidt? All that was missing is Sean Penn as Karl Rove, and Tim Robbins as Mitt Romney.

How could anyone expect to believe that these numbskull, uber-Libs could make a credible movie about the Republican campaign?

17 posted on 03/09/2012 7:06:06 PM PST by cincinnati65 (We've been taken for a ride - by Wall Street and Washington DC - Welcome to Amerika!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson