Posted on 03/14/2012 9:27:16 PM PDT by VinL
So (sic) bytthe reasoning of the very article being cited favorably here.......
***************
Who is citing it favorably?
Absolutely on point! Indeed 57% of Gingrich voters would migrate to Santorum. This is why like in AR, Santorum scored a big win with over 51% of the vote.
Well, you didn’t put a “Barf alert” on it, or say anything unfavorable about it in the comments. But yes, you didn’t say anything particularly positive either.
BTW, anybody on the Gingrich team know what happened to TBBT? I just noticed I haven’t seen a post by that freeper in over a month.
Paul needs to get out of the race!
But yes, you didn’t say anything particularly positive either.
****************
Right; I posted w/o comment as to its content; as a matter potentially of interest to some. So, another erroneous, flawed post that you have directed at me— it’s getting tedious.
Rick would need 66% of the remaining 1358 delegates to get to 1144. That isn’t going to happen.
If they can keep Romney from getting the number needed, then his camp will have to think real hard not only a VP slot, but about the Platform AND the stance they must take after the Convention.
i”m sorry you are so used to perfect people. I acknowledged the error, that’s really all I can do because I haven’t got my own time machine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.