Posted on 03/16/2012 1:23:18 AM PDT by Libloather
Interesting to see Greta chime in on this. Thanks for posting.
Barnett is my favorite constitutional geek.
A layman’s interpretation of his paper would make a great vanity wouldn’t it?
Door number 1 would be quite interesting on the legal/lawful front; but I’m betting the USSC will not dare touch it a it is almost their golden goose. (2nd, I believe, only to Roe v. Wade, because so long as Roe v. Wade stands the USSC can point to it as justification for any ruling which in essence alters the Constitution.)
That leaves Door #2. They may wish they’d chosen Door #1.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.