Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vulnerable Senate Dems don't rule out voting against Obama (/Commiecare™) cost-control board
The Hill ^ | 3/17/12 | Julian Pecquet

Posted on 03/17/2012 3:12:44 PM PDT by Libloather

Vulnerable Senate Dems don't rule out voting against Obama cost-control board
By Julian Pecquet - 03/17/12 03:00 PM ET

Several Senate Democrats up for reelection tell The Hill they haven't ruled out bucking President Obama by voting to repeal the health law's cost-control board.

The House is expected to repeal the Independent Payment Advisory Board next week, putting pressure on the Senate to follow suit. While the bill has broad bipartisan support in the House, no Senate Democrats have so far signed onto repeal legislation despite coming under increasing pressure to do so.

"We're looking at it, let's put it that way," said Sen. Joe Machin (D-W.Va.). "We'll weigh the pros and cons" if the bill hits the floor.

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), another conservative Democrat in a tight race, said via a spokesman that she would take a "hard look" at the proposal if it ever came before the Senate.

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), a liberal, also declined to rule out voting for repeal.

"I'm not going to answer a what-if question when it's not at all clear what would come up," he said.

McCaskill and Brown are reeling from a $3.5 million ad campaign by the conservative 60 Plus seniors' lobby that also targets Sens. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) and Jon Tester (D-Mont.).

Senators are also hearing from a wide array of powerful stakeholder groups, including the American Medical Association and the American Hospital Association, that are lobbying hard to get the board nixed.

The intense lobbying is putting Obama's deficit-cutting efforts at risk. The IPAB is one of the few provisions of the healthcare reform law that has the potential to cut federal healthcare spending, by recommending cuts to Medicare provider payments if costs start to grow too fast.

Obama, as part of his $3 trillion deficit-reduction plan last year, called for strengthening the IPAB by allowing it to become operational sooner and lowering the growth target at which it kicks into gear. Republicans, however, have attacked the panel of 15 experts as a "rationing board," a charge that has made it harder for Democrats to support the measure.

In the House, 20 Democrats have co-sponsored legislation to repeal the board, and many more had been expected to vote for repeal. That expectation was squashed however after Republicans decided to pay for the $3 billion cost of repealing the board by tying it to medical malpractice legislation that's much more controversial.

The difficulty in finding an acceptable offset may also give Senate Democrats an easy out.

The Senate repeal bill, sponsored by Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), is paid for by cutting the health law's insurance subsidies. That may not be acceptable to Democrats and does nothing to control Medicare costs.

"I think that people who are attacking IPAB need to come up with their own solutions on how we restrain costs," Brown said. "They keep talking about costs, but they never have offered anything."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: control; cost; healthcare; senate
RATS repeal Commiecare™. Who saw THAT coming?
1 posted on 03/17/2012 3:12:53 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Yeah RIGHT.

Look, we saw their performance with Reed during the original debate.

Nobody's buying their chewed bubblegum, no mo'.

2 posted on 03/17/2012 3:16:56 PM PDT by Lazamataz ("We beat the Soviet Union, then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“Sen. Joe Machin (D-W.Va.)...

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), another conservative Democrat “
LOL! Only in Obama’s “The Hill”.


3 posted on 03/17/2012 3:19:18 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"We'll weigh the pros and cons"

It's tough deciding what to do when the only thing you care about is getting re-elected.

4 posted on 03/17/2012 3:20:54 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

So, when the Dems vote this down, how many headlines will scream “Democrats Approve Death Panels”??


5 posted on 03/17/2012 3:24:38 PM PDT by radioone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Actually, Claire is a conservative Democrat. The problem is that it still puts her to the left of most RINO’s. And she will never vote against the party on Senate rules.


6 posted on 03/17/2012 3:48:00 PM PDT by rwa265 ("This is My Beloved Son, Listen to Him.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rwa265

Joe and Claire could reasonably be descibed as ‘moderate’ Dems I suppose.
Meaning they’ll vote in a moderate or conservative way when liberal bills can be passed anyway without their vote. Webb was a good one for that too.

I was thinking the other day how definitions have changed and it occured to me the only Senators with what I cansider liberal positions are thr RINOs. Socialism has claimed all the Dem Party.


7 posted on 03/17/2012 4:07:35 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), another conservative Democrat

No such animal exists. Claire is going to lose her reelection bid and is trying her damnedest to appear conservative.

8 posted on 03/17/2012 5:06:23 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Eccl 10 v. 19 A feast is made for laughter, and wine maketh merry: but money answereth all things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

There are only “LOSER” DIMocRATs.


9 posted on 03/17/2012 5:12:53 PM PDT by ogen hal (First amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

ping


10 posted on 03/17/2012 5:22:12 PM PDT by Marcella (Vote Newt; Newt needs money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Conservative Democrat = Marxist
Liberal Democrat = Stalinist


11 posted on 03/17/2012 8:10:28 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson