Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Florida shooter a vigilante or diligent neighbor?
AP via Washington Times ^ | M>arch 22, 2012 | Mike Schneider

Posted on 03/22/2012 5:48:28 AM PDT by libstripper

George Zimmerman once took criminal justice classes at the community college and was practically a one-man neighborhood watch in his gated part of town, calling police close to 50 times over the past eight years to report such things as slow-driving vehicles, strangers loitering in the neighborhood and open garages.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: flshooting; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-183 next last
To: lacrew
The community is apparently gated but not controlled ~ best I could find out. There are an awful lot of rentals there ~ looks like they got blasted by the housing crash in Florida so some things had to go ~ like a check in/check out station, etc.

The father is identified in some reports as living in this development.

http://www.trulia.com/homes/Florida/Sanford/sold/25266156-3210-Retreat-View-Cir-Sanford-FL-32771 has a pretty good map ref for the entire street called Retreat View Circle.

There are 4 7/11s out on Route 46 ~ reasonably walkable for a kid, but there's also a small shopping center FAR CLOSER. This particular community is the low budget location ~ the surrounding properties are higher cost.

101 posted on 03/22/2012 8:26:50 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

http://baynews9.com/content/news/baynews9/news/article.html/content/news/articles/cfn/2012/3/22/trayvon_martin_faq_f

But what do the cops know. The MSM, Al Sharpton, the CBC, and other assorted Leftists all know better.


102 posted on 03/22/2012 8:27:56 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade

Please, your attempts at apples and oranges are ludicrous.

Zimmerman didn’t simply do something stupid, he created the confrontation.. Walking through a rough neighborhood doesn’t create a confrontation.. shadowing someone, stalking them, who is doing nothing but walking down the street and then confronting them when within physical contact is not remotely the same.

Zimmerman wasn’t just walking down the street, minding his own business and was suddenly assaulted by martin, attempting to portray it as that is idiotic, and that’s being generous.

Zimmerman 100% created this situation, he stalked Martin, tailed him, got so close that a physical altercation happened. Martin didn’t go up to Zimmerman, he was by all accounts walking down a public street.. Trying to equate what Zimmerman did to just some person walking down a street and being mugged doesn’t remotely hold water.

Zimmerman, 100% created the situation. I don’t know about you, but when I got someone stalking me, I ain’t going to be friendly when they grab at me, or come within striking distance. Zimmermans actions completely created the confrontation, he has absolutely no merit to claim self defense. This overzealous wanna be cop bit off more than he could chew, and when it didn’t go the way he wanted, he shot the guy.

Zimmerman isn’t a victim, he’s an idiot with a gun who gives all gun owners a bad name. Rule number one of being an adult, let alone a gun carrying adult, is DON’T GO LOOKING FOR TROUBLE. Zimmerman clearly went looking for trouble, made repeatedly bad decisions and created the confrontation that lead to the situation. He has no grounds for self defense.

You start a fight with someone, then you are on the losing side of it, you can’t claim you engaged in self defense.. YOU WERE THE INSTIGATOR. Zimmerman was clearly the instigator of this situation, without any question.

He’s no victim, just an idiot.


103 posted on 03/22/2012 8:32:31 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: moehoward
Sorry, Martin bought the Skittles. He didn't leave the house to go hunting Zimmerman. Wasn't his purpose at all. He was after candy. Besides, the event stretches out over time. There's no obligation whatsoever for a person to give up and walk away ~ self defense may require elimination of the threat (with less than lethal force).

After a few minutes looking at a better map of the area I can't imagine that Zimmerman, if he really lived there, could have difficulty providing an address for the location. Follow his words. He referred to 111 as the best address he could give. That's an Orthodontists in a nearby business zone ~ not at all where this kid was shot.

104 posted on 03/22/2012 8:32:47 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: faucetman
I don't care if he followed Trayvon Martin all over the area calling Trayvon’ mom a crack whore

No bias there.

Actually such behaviour by Zimmerman WOULD invalidate any attempt by him to claim a Stand Your Ground Defence.

105 posted on 03/22/2012 8:35:39 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (This world is a comedy to those that think, a tragedy to those that feel - Horace Walpole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Bring your witnesses in for a sworn deposition. Now that your boy is revealed to have told the dispatcher AN ADDRESS that’s not even inside the bounds of the “gated community”, all your hypotheticals are revealed to be just so much garbage.


106 posted on 03/22/2012 8:36:41 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Martin still had a right to be where he was. Zimmerman has yet to be demonstrated to have had a right to follow a guy around a public street stalking him.


107 posted on 03/22/2012 8:37:56 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
It always helps to get the whole story before jumping to conclusions.

Funny that your next paragraph has enough 'conclusions' to close the case.

I get it, you've decided that you know what happened. Fair enough.

Just don't act like you are being open minded.

108 posted on 03/22/2012 8:38:57 AM PDT by Mr.Unique (EVERYBODY is a RINO. Except me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

You are clearly ignorant of the facts, your work is one of fiction, complete and utter.

He reported this guy from his car, he was told they would send a patrol and not to follow the guy.. Zimmerman not only continued to tale the guy, he got out of the car, stalked him and got close enough for physical contact, your attempt at he was just pretending to be neighborly is a complete work of fiction.

You want to be neighborly you don’t call the cops first.

You want to be neighborly you don’t stalk someone first in your vehicle and then on foot.

You want to find out what they are doing as a good neighbor you don’t need to be within physical contact to ask them a question.

You live im a world of absolute dillusion if you think what you presented remotely fits reality.

What you have is a wanna be cop, who bit off more than he could chew, nothing more.

I am so sick of every time someone does something completely and utterly stupid with a gun, the riff raff comes out of the woodwork doing handsprings of logic and reality in attempts to defend it. A few year ago a guy shot a kid in the back for playing ding and dash, and folks just like you jumped through the same idiotic arguments trying to defend the fool with the gun. Its like clockwork when this sort of thing happens. Need to stop the insane groupthink and wake up.

Not everyone with a gun deserves defending, when someone does something incredibly stupid with a gun, they need called on it... and this guy did so many stupid things, he has no case for self defense, none. Its not the MSM, that’s fact.

Keep living in your dream world, but when this guy goes up on charges, and pleas or gets convicted, you can feel safe that while your grand dillusion continues to exist in your mind, the real world didn’t buy into it.


109 posted on 03/22/2012 8:40:35 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Still all that hate and disrespect for law enforcement.

You are the only one spinning hypotheticals here.

110 posted on 03/22/2012 8:40:57 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
" He didn't leave the house to go hunting Zimmerman. "

How do you know? You seem dead set on considering only that which confirms your position even if it's complete fabrication.

The fact is we don't know. Who does? The police. My only hope is the facts, rather than public pressure, guide their decisions.

111 posted on 03/22/2012 8:45:33 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
You are clearly ignorant of the facts...

More projection. What I have is from the scant information the police have released and the parts from sources that aren't subject to editorializing.

What you have is delusion spun from race baiting hate mongers.

Keep living in your dream world, but when this guy goes up on charges, and pleas or gets convicted, you can feel safe that while your grand dillusion continues to exist in your mind, the real world didn’t buy into it.

And you are equally delusional to think that a 6' 3" male pounding on you doesn't deserve a bullet.

112 posted on 03/22/2012 8:45:39 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I know, but idiots like this show up everytime someone with a gun does something incredibly stupid.

I’m as pro 2nd ammendment as they come, but you don’t defend everyone who does something with a gun, when someone does something STUPID and WRONG, you call them on it, not invent leaps of logic to try to defend them.

I had these same arguments about the child molester than killed that little girl in California, some folks were jumping through hoops trying to defend the guy, because in their mind he didn’t look the part, and the fact their parents were swingers was more an affront than the overwhelming evidence that this guy abducted and killed their little girl.

A few years ago another fool with a gun shot a kid in the back who was ringing doorbells and running away, same stupid arguments and dillusions were regurgitated by folks on that case as well.

Now we have this one. Its absolutely idiotic. Zimmerman claiming victim status, or someone else claiming it for him is absolutely dillusional. I can understand why the cops at the scene initially did not arrest him, as they probably had no access to the 911 calls etc, just the witnesses and Zimmermans account. In the wake of those calls however this guy should be charged, he has no claim to self defense.

Based on the evidence to date it is absolutely clear Zimmerman went looking for trouble, and frankly, while no one but God and Zimmerman know, I suspect highly this idiot was the first to actually make physical contact. He decided he was going to play cop, and it backfired big time on him. He’s got no self defense argument to stand on.


113 posted on 03/22/2012 8:48:16 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: moehoward
He went for Skittles and tea. He had Skittles and tea on him suggesting he was RETURNING from where he said he was going.

That's the evidence.

The cops simply dropped the ball on this one. It does appear the neighborhood watch guy shot and killed one of the neighborhood's kids.

A grand jury will hear this on (I believe) April 10.

114 posted on 03/22/2012 8:50:00 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
If you go around hunting people they might fight back. No, they do not deserve to be shot.

Thinking back on it, the last event we had like this was up in Wisconsin where an Hmong guy hunted some hunters.

He used a self-defense argument ~ then they found he'd shot unarmed people.

No doubt his argument seemed airtight until a bit of investigation revealed otherwise.

I'd bet we still have some Freepers who think the Hmong guy acted in self defense though. After all, he had a gun, and gun owners are always right ~ but sometimes they aren't, and occasionally one of them might be up to no good.

115 posted on 03/22/2012 8:54:58 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
If you go around hunting people they might fight back. No, they do not deserve to be shot.

Thinking back on it, the last event we had like this was up in Wisconsin where an Hmong guy hunted some hunters.

He used a self-defense argument ~ then they found he'd shot unarmed people.

No doubt his argument seemed airtight until a bit of investigation revealed otherwise.

I'd bet we still have some Freepers who think the Hmong guy acted in self defense though. After all, he had a gun, and gun owners are always right ~ but sometimes they aren't, and occasionally one of them might be up to no good.

116 posted on 03/22/2012 8:55:21 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Zimmerman is being tried and found guilty in the court of race baiting public opinion and the media.

The police are handling this in a manner which indicates the evidence tells them that Zimmerman has some probable defense in the SYG interpretation. They are behaving as if they don’t want to go any further with this in fear of losing any potential civil lawsuit against them by Zimmerman for false arrest, etc.

How Zimmerman interacted initially with Martin or vice versa, is not known. But as the evidence indicates, Martin obviously started getting the better of Zimmerman, enough so that Zimmerman felt threatened enough to use his firearm.

Now all that’s left for some is the hanging of Zimmerman I guess, especially some of those here on FR who are opining with an incomplete set of facts in their little bag of tricks.

The bastards in the media and the race baiters are doing their jobs well.

It’s interesting that just a few years ago, the race baiting NACCP and others, wanted to “wait for all of the facts to come out” when some black females in Long Beach were yelling racial epithets at whites and subsequently beat a bunch of them down in what was obviously a racially motivated attack. Funny, they don’t appear willing to “wait for all of the facts to come out” here.


117 posted on 03/22/2012 8:57:49 AM PDT by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political party's in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
" It does appear the neighborhood watch guy shot and killed one of the neighborhood's kids."

"...neighborhood's kids" LOL. How about a neighborhood "visitor". Of course it doesn't carry that needed familiarity angle you need.....

118 posted on 03/22/2012 9:04:31 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

>>>Zimmerman didn’t simply do something stupid, he created the confrontation.. Walking through a rough neighborhood doesn’t create a confrontation.. shadowing someone, stalking them, who is doing nothing but walking down the street and then confronting them when within physical contact is not remotely the same.<<

Where is the evidence that Zimmerman “confronted him with physical contact”?

If someone follows me around a gated community, that I don’t live in, am I allowed to start pummeling that person, (causing him to bleed from his nose and a wound on the back of his neck) tell him I am going to kill him (as Zimmerman claims Martin did) and go for his gun?

Now, if Zimmerman actually attacked Martin first, all bets are off, and Zimmerman should go to jail. However, I have not even heard that claim made, much less any evidence to support such a claim.

Are you really stating that if I get close enough to a young 6’3” thug that he can chase me down and start beating me, I “100% created the situation”?

Some of you guys belong at DU or on the payroll of the Natinoal Action Network.


119 posted on 03/22/2012 9:09:40 AM PDT by Above My Pay Grade (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade; HamiltonJay
Are you really stating that if I get close enough to a young 6’3” thug that he can chase me down and start beating me, I “100% created the situation”?

First of all, you're assuming something without evidence as seen by your use of the word "thug." But, otherwise, if you go after someone with no legal justification or authority and he ends up kicking the crap out of you, then, yes, you "100% created the situation."
120 posted on 03/22/2012 9:13:26 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson