Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
From my impression of how the physical confrontation started, I don't think the "stand your ground" principle is in play, at all.

I would agree with you there. If one were attacked from behind and knocked to the ground then pummeled by an assailant much larger than you, standing ones ground is no longer in the equation. It has now become a matter of survival........

"Stand your ground" presumes that you have an avenue of retreat. Mr. Zimmerman did not, he was on his back with his assailant on top of him......

72 posted on 03/24/2012 6:03:18 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (No matter what you post here, someone's going to get pissed off......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Hot Tabasco
-- If one were attacked from behind and knocked to the ground then pummeled by an assailant much larger than you, standing ones ground is no longer in the equation. --

Yep. Once you're overwhelmed with physical force, the option of retreat ins't available. It would be asinine for the law to assign a duty to retreat, to a person who is overwhelmed with force.

80 posted on 03/24/2012 6:13:07 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson