Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Republicans Get Behind Mitt Romney [Leads Santorum by 19 Points: Nominated Sealed?]
LATimes ^ | March 25, 2012 | Seema Mehta

Posted on 03/24/2012 7:33:04 PM PDT by Steelfish

California Republicans Get Behind Mitt Romney The national front-runner has a substantial lead in the state over Rick Santorum, with other rivals trailing in the distance. But there's little enthusiasm for the GOP field overall.

By Seema Mehta March 25, 2012 Republican voters in California have swung behind Mitt Romney, with the national presidential front-runner crushing his rivals by double digits and substantially expanding his support in the state, a new poll has found.

Romney won 42% of registered Republican voters, with his closest rival, Rick Santorum, trailing by 19 points, according to the USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times poll. Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul were a distant third and fourth.

Romney's support has risen by 15 points since a November USC/Times poll, when Herman Cain was his closest competitor. (The former businessman has since dropped out.)

Yet there remains a palpable lack of enthusiasm for the Republican field. Half of GOP voters said they wished other candidates were running for president.

Barbara Foley, a 73-year-old Republican, said she would prefer former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio or Rep. Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin. She decided to vote for Romney by process of elimination — she says Santorum is too socially conservative, Gingrich is smart but a "loose cannon," and Paul — "well, I just think he's nuttier than a fruitcake."

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ca2012; cagop; romney; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Steelfish

It ain’t over until the Etch-a-Sketch gets erased.


21 posted on 03/24/2012 9:22:14 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

Keep supporting your “lunar colony” dead-man walking. I think the voters have had “enough” of his big ideas, he’s coming a distant third even in La. Wow! that takes an achievement.


22 posted on 03/24/2012 9:31:05 PM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

Keep supporting your “lunar colony” dead-man walking. I think the voters have had “enough” of his big ideas, he’s coming a distant third even in La. Wow! that takes an achievement.


23 posted on 03/24/2012 9:31:17 PM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: zipper

You make a good point. It’s anybody but Obama for me.


24 posted on 03/24/2012 9:33:02 PM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Mitt can’t top 42% in what is essentially a two man race now. Not very impressive.


25 posted on 03/24/2012 10:05:30 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I may just have to get with some enterprising Freepers and other Conservatives to get a billboard or two out, Ben Franklin style.

Mitt Newt.....


26 posted on 03/25/2012 12:10:02 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zipper
His Illinois speech was his most conservative yet

And it was at that point milt's adviser reminded nervous members of the msm and Rino establishment that milt is an Etch-a-Sketch. Therefore, any "offensive" statements milt may have made in the Illinois speech can be wiped away in the wave of a hand.

27 posted on 03/25/2012 12:37:54 AM PDT by rhinohunter (Not voting for etchamitt...no way...no how)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: zipper
His Illinois speech was his most conservative yet

And it was at that point milt's adviser reminded nervous members of the msm and Rino establishment that milt is an Etch-a-Sketch. Therefore, any "offensive" statements milt may have made in the Illinois speech can be wiped away in the wave of a hand.

28 posted on 03/25/2012 12:38:30 AM PDT by rhinohunter (Not voting for etchamitt...no way...no how)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
This discription " a palpable lack of enthusiasm for the Republican field" is just the medias way of tying to bring down enthusiasm for getting rid of zer0. Stay positive, Getting rid of the cancer in the White House is what this is all about. I am excited about that ! Can't wait to vote.
29 posted on 03/25/2012 1:29:34 AM PDT by reefdiver ("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

<<<<<<<Mr. Reagan won in 1966, even though he’d been married twice. That’s a long time ago. Is Ricky superior to those of us who’ve been divorced?<<<<<<<<<<<<

Of course not. But Ricky, as you dismissively refer to him, courageously points out the devastating toll of the crumbling American family. Neither socialism nor Ryan budget plans cannot solve the problem of selfish, materialistic, child-abandoning parents. Our nation has a 50 percent divorce rate. Forty percent of babies are born out of wedlock and many will head for the welfare rolls or jail.

The welfare state prospers when the family does not. Kudos to Santorum for pointing out the truth.


30 posted on 03/25/2012 6:40:40 AM PDT by heye2monn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Not necessarily. As a friend of mine once explained, after his fifth wife divorced him, it was simply a case of poor wife selection skills. Somehow, he'd married five bad wives.

As I said, something is wrong with the person if he marries more than twice. In this instance, there's something really wrong with that person's judgment.

31 posted on 03/25/2012 9:36:35 AM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: IceAge

Ref your post 15, I had no reference at all to someone whose marriage ends in death. Why should I, for goodness sakes? And, as I pointed out, I completely understand divorce in the instance of the first marriage, one is often young and naive in those marriages.

I have reference to those men who engage in serial marriages because they come across younger and more beautiful babes. Rush Limbaugh comes immediately to mind. And I believe there is something wrong with him and others like him. For one thing, they cannot comprehend the meaning of “til death do us part.” The marriage vows mean nothing to them.


32 posted on 03/25/2012 9:44:16 AM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

California’s delegates would be seated between the Red Chinese and the North Korean delegations at a real Republican Convention...

Sheesh.


33 posted on 03/25/2012 9:57:15 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhinohunter

True, and it’s not like his winks to the MSM will help him. They’re still in the tank for the Usurper. They’ll turn on him in a NY heartbeat the moment he wins the primary, just like they did with McLame.


34 posted on 03/25/2012 12:23:08 PM PDT by zipper (espions sur les occupants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson