Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain: I think Palin should be the VP nominee
Hot Air ^ | APRIL 4, 2012 | TINA KORBE

Posted on 04/04/2012 7:11:17 AM PDT by RobinMasters

Yesterday, Sarah Palin emphasized in her interview with Matt Lauer that whoever becomes the GOP nominee should not play it safe in his selection of a vice presidential running mate. She declined to answer outright whether she thinks this year’s VP nominee should have more experience on the national stage than she did in 2008, but she did say she thinks the presidential nominee should “go rogue” with his pick.

Former GOP presidential nominee John McCain backed up those statements today with this:

On CBS’s This Morning, McCain, the 2008 GOP nominee, was asked whether he agreed with his former running mate that Romney should ‘go rogue’ in picking a vice president.

“I think it should be Sarah Palin,” McCain answered, laughing. And while he did not backtrack from that statement, he did say that there was a “wealth of talent” in the GOP field, including Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal.

It’s an interesting proposition. She’s far more seasoned than she was in 2008, with a loyal fan base that would be incredibly energized by her presence on the ticket. But would she accept? She declined to run for the presidency herself, maintaining that she can have more influence as a media presence than as an actual candidate. If she worried she wouldn’t have enough influence as the presidential nominee or the president, then she surely wouldn’t be satisfied with the level of influence the vice presidential nomination offers, even if it was her launching pad to the fame she now enjoys.

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; mccain2008; mccainlostin2008; mccainpalinpart2; mccainsucked; mccainwastheproblem; mitt2lose; mitt4romney; obama2ndterm; obamasecondterm; obamasgoingtowin; palin; palincantsaveromney; palinwasntenough; repeating2008; romney; romney2lose; romney4romney; romneyistheproblem; sarahpalin; wehavealreadylost; whyrepeat2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: Retired Greyhound

A VP would not balance that ticket. It would only provide cover for a liberal.


81 posted on 04/04/2012 3:09:29 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Lets face it. We need a miracle. Without one we’re screwed.

So pray for a miracle...

And expect the worse...


82 posted on 04/04/2012 3:36:37 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

When is Bristol’s reality show? Because I think it would be difficult to run for VP while your daughter is enjoying a ‘trial marriage’ on a reality show. It would be a huge distraction.


83 posted on 04/04/2012 3:58:40 PM PDT by turn_to
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2012winner
Just go ahead and vote for whom you're TOLD to vote for; GOP-e can ALWAYS count on dunces who do as they're told.

As for me (and most Conservatives), we see the writing on the wall, where the Elites on BOTH SIDES put the ones they want forward, and the dunces vote for the (D) or (R), regardless of who or what they are.

Most of the real Americans have woken up to the charade, but, unfortunately, you are draggin' ass in the (R) column.

Good luck voting for a Loser.

84 posted on 04/04/2012 4:36:07 PM PDT by traditional1 (Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

Fooled in 2008 by McCain-Palin. Will NEVER happen again. No. More. RINOS.


85 posted on 04/04/2012 6:15:33 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

McCain back stabs Palin again!


86 posted on 04/04/2012 6:22:27 PM PDT by Randy Larsen (No Romney or Santorum vote from my family!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2012winner

You signed up today to lecture us with this crap?


87 posted on 04/04/2012 6:27:00 PM PDT by j_tull ("I may make you feel, but I can't make you think.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet
Sarah has not declined to run for the presidency, she stepped aside

Why couldn't she run against the existing candidates? Debate them and take the slings and arrows?

I could win the US Open if I only had to play the back nine rather than playing all eighteen with the other players.

88 posted on 04/04/2012 6:29:23 PM PDT by Eaker (Remember, the enemy tends to wise up at the least convenient moments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

He’s part of the two party system.


89 posted on 04/04/2012 6:32:08 PM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

You got my vote.


90 posted on 04/04/2012 6:34:35 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Or, more accurately---reason serves faith. See W.L. Craig, R. Zacharias, Erwin Lutzer, and others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

McCain only said this to give FReepers a reason to talk about him.


91 posted on 04/04/2012 6:58:38 PM PDT by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
Why couldn't she run against the existing candidates?

Sarah isn't one of the "established elites" inside the Republican Party. Her greatest interests are not with party-line politics; they're with people. She took over in Alaska, for instance, and proceeded to unseat or prosecute corrupt politicians ... Murkowski's included.

What she's doing now, along with NBC and Fox News appearances, is supporting Tea Party candidates that will put her in good standing with the right kind of people.

92 posted on 04/04/2012 7:41:42 PM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet

So it is okay for me just to play the back nine if my interests are “with people”. To hell with the process if this is the way I can win with the least effort and making the most money.

I understand now. Sort of.


93 posted on 04/04/2012 7:49:40 PM PDT by Eaker (Remember, the enemy tends to wise up at the least convenient moments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
To hell with the process

Sarah is a problem solving doer, not a political-process person.

I'd say that her not getting into the standard process, aka debates, was a wise decision.

We shall see.

94 posted on 04/04/2012 8:01:04 PM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong; All

If they want to make China happy, maybe they should pick Huntsman.


95 posted on 04/04/2012 9:39:56 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: traditional1
That said, prepare for Obama for 4 more years, because the GOP-e has selected Romney-the-RINO, and he won't win in this lifetime.....he's Obama-lite.

Looks like you want obama.

96 posted on 04/04/2012 9:58:18 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bruinator
She is fine right where she is. She is not presidential material, and she shouldn’t be thoght of in that light. People do her a great disservice after the B.S. she and her family went through. Subjecting her to that scrutiny again is abuse.

The field is poor, weak, and completely lacking. Just have to hope the house stays and possibly the senate becomes closer a more conservative body.

Hopefully 2016 will bare more conservative fruit.

Of course Sarah Palin is Presidential material. It looks as if you have given up already.

97 posted on 04/04/2012 10:03:28 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I’m okay with Palin as Gingrich’s VP! ;) Or Santorum.


98 posted on 04/04/2012 11:02:55 PM PDT by Nobama_ever (Newt/Santorum or Santorum/Newt...NO Rombama and NO 0bama!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j_tull

You know, he kind of has a point.

I’ve been lurking for a while too and I seem to recall Nikki Haley as the next conservative superstar. She supports Romney in South Carolina and the next thing you know, conservatives start calling her a RINO? How in God’s name could anyone ever assume that Haley isn’t a conservative?

Same thing with John Bolton!

I’m a Newt supporter and steadily worked on his campaign here in Florida. I’ll take Santorum in a pinch. Romney? Not so much. I don’t like him or his left-leaning politics, but I worry more about an unchecked second Obama term...when he’s got an aging USSC and doesn’t have re-election to worry about!


99 posted on 04/04/2012 11:03:11 PM PDT by Nobama_ever (Newt/Santorum or Santorum/Newt...NO Rombama and NO 0bama!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: 2012winner

ABO-— Anybody but Obama. I’ll gladly vote Romney over Obama if it comes to that.


100 posted on 04/04/2012 11:09:09 PM PDT by dennisw (A nation of sheep breeds a government of Democrat wolves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson