Eric Holder Letter

Fox News ^ | 4/5/2012 | Holder

[norwaypinesavage]

Here is the Holder Letter. The question now is: "Is the distortion intentional?

[hoosiermama]

YES

[MrB]

When Barack Obama was saying there shouldn’t be any judicial review of Obamacare,

he was actually supporting judicial review.

[vg0va3]

I only counted 2 pages with a big signature.

He would have gotten an F (again) for this assignment. I was taught that 3 pages single space mean 3 pages single space. Not two pages and a fat signature line.

This guy can not follow instructions at all.

[ctdonath2]

Ends with the non-sequitur “The President’s remarks were fully consistent with the principles described herein.” The principles described herein were that the court has a proper, albeit not unrestrained, power to overturn unconstitutional laws (which are presumed legitimate until proven otherwise). The President’s remarks bear no resemblance to the principles described by AG Holder.

2+2=5

[ctdonath2]

A nose-thumbing moment. Knows the court won’t come back with “we said 3 pages!”, and knows it’s not because the court didn’t notice.

[treetopsandroofs]

Holder’s view through Sh!t goggles.... his head is so far up Hussein’s posterior, this is the best things can look.

The punk racist Holder.

[norwaypinesavage]

"He would have gotten an F (again) for this assignment."

True, but affirmative action would result in an A on the transcript.

[pabianice]

“We agree that the Courts may review laws when we think it is appropriate.” Astonishing.

[TexasCajun]

Jay Carny! Eric Holder !!

Clean up on isle 2.

[Hodar]

I would like to have from you by noon on Thursday…a letter stating what is the position of the Attorney General and the Department of Justice, in regard to the recent statements by the President, stating specifically and in detail in reference to those statements what the authority is of the federal courts in this regard in terms of judicial review. That letter needs to be at least three pages single spaced, no less, and it needs to be specific. It needs to make specific reference to the President’s statements and again to the position of the Attorney General and the Department of Justice.

Sounds like they can't follow very specific, very easy-to-understand langage.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

No more intentional than usual.

[Harley]

I only counted 2 pages with a big signature.

Not to mention that he spent one half page to restate the question. I imagine this letter cost the government about $50,000 to produce giving the man hours in researching and staffing the response and then the 50 cent response that Holder tossed in.

[exit82]

The only line Holder read was the last one, before he signed, and it is false anyway.

FUEH and your boss, too.

[eureka!]

Bingo. An FU to the 5th. It will not go unnoticed by the entire Federal judiciary. Thanks 0bama!

[freeangel]

Like his brother from anothr mother-—LIAR!

[exit82]

As I recall, the judge said “at least three pages”.

FAIL.

[Aria]

“We agree that the Courts may review laws when we think it is appropriate.” Astonishing.

Yes, it is breathtaking! Incredible disregard for the constitution, and they hold an obvious total disragard for the constitution and I have to think race has a lot to do with this.

[Aria]

acck! This is what I get for posting while at work.

[Georgia Girl 2]

“This guy can not follow instructions at all.”

This guy will not follow instructions at all.

This is called the bare minimum to save yourself from a contempt citation and a few days in the pokey.