Politics mostly means voting for the least worst candidate, not a candidate who's really good.
For me, Obama is the worst worst candidate. Stopping his reelection is job 1.
THAT should have been done during the off year with the man's failing to prove his eligibility. We're in a different nation now. Now it's American until proven otherwise. Obama's not going anywhere even if the God-Father of ObamaCare were to actually win the election. Obama's here to stay. Guaranteed he'll still be President after Jan 20th 2016.
The damage has been done. We cannot pick and chose which parts of the US Constition are to be enforced and which parts are to be ignored. But that's exactly what we did.
I’m increasingly skeptical
that voting makes a significant difference.
There’s too many proven ways they have and can manipulate the figures.
All the more so with one globalist family producing the voting machines that have proven easily hackable.
I remember back when I was in High School when JFK ‘won’ the SElection . . . I felt then that things were rigged . . . as was later proven . . . his dad bought sufficient Chicago votes to put him in and Nixon refused to contest the vote. That was the first SElection I was old enough to bother much about.
Things have gotten ENORMOUSLY WORSE since then.
“For me, Obama is the worst worst candidate.”
What is worse, a liberal canidate every RINO will give a pass to or one they might resist? Romney will get a rubber stamp by the RINOs.