If he's lawfully used deadly force in self defense, the downside to charging him is capitulation of the law to the will of the mob.
His black friend, Owens was asked if we would hear there was a struggle over the gun. He said “I think you just may be hearing about that.” I bet they did some tests on the gun.
Perfect post.
If he was within whatever the legal boundaries are in Florida to use deadly force to protect his life, he should not be charged. This is a real human being’s life at stake (or rather, what is left of his life after the media gang raped him), and an ignorant mob must not be allowed to override law and this man’s legal right to protect himself.
Did he have the legal right to protect himself? If the answer is “yes,” then he should not be charged. Period.
The mobs and media cannot be allowed to sit as judge and jury. I do not care about his race, his political bent, or anything else to do with his personal life. It’s whether or not he acted within the law.
If he is charged, all hell may break loose — but from the OTHER side.
Best Regards,
SC
|
That's no change from the status quo. |
As yet unsaid..If she doesn’t charge him, you can bet that within 24 hours Eric Holder’s DoJ will charge Zimmerman with violating Trayvon’s civil rights..heck..forget 24 hours..how about 24 SECONDS..I bet the documents,a nd the press releases, are already prepared..