There is no state that Romney won that was not a result of his money advantage.
It does make one wonder who the candidate would be if none of them had any money and just had to go on the basis of public broadcast of debates or discussions.
You need to factor in state-controlled media's crusade against all things conservative.
Money can't buy that. It's already been bought and paid for.
“There is no state that Romney won that was not a result of his money advantage.”
Romney won’t have the money advantage against Obama, and the free positive publicity Obama will have from LMSM will be priceless.
If only voters would depend on their own research, rather than believe the countless attack ads that rich candidates can afford.