Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Son House

Why are we there at all? At this point, what is our national interest there? What is our mission objective?


9 posted on 04/15/2012 5:36:41 AM PDT by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Scutter

We’re there to tie up troops, demoralize our fighting men and women, and provide occasional political distractions.
In Obumoville it’s “Bush’s War” don’t ya know.


10 posted on 04/15/2012 5:50:31 AM PDT by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Scutter

We were supposed to herd the muslims and get the wolf Taleban out, but our PC psyops is a complete failure. Our language of “Islam is peace”,”insurgent”, and “war of contingency” have degraded the mission against terrorists and serious violent herders.

Their attacks are shaped into herding us instead of us herding them as per our failed fundamentals of our psy op. As a result we are not sure what we are doing now aside from providing like slaves arms to people we do not even know.


13 posted on 04/15/2012 6:21:42 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Scutter

We’re nation building...you know, because 7th century Islamic filth want to be just like the good old USA!


15 posted on 04/15/2012 6:32:28 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Scutter

For soetoro to have as many American troops killed as possible. That’s the mission.


16 posted on 04/15/2012 6:35:08 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Scutter
"Why are we there at all? At this point, what is our national interest there? What is our mission objective?"

Opium fields guarded by U.S. troops in Afghanistan

18 posted on 04/15/2012 6:46:21 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Scutter; Son House
Why are we there at all? At this point, what is our national interest there? What is our mission objective?

Don't you know if we don't fight them over there we'll have the fight them here?

I live overseas and I know that line of thought is pure bullshit.

20 posted on 04/15/2012 6:50:54 AM PDT by Doofer (Still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Scutter

>>Why are we there at all?

US Soldiers guarding  pium in Afghanistan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChIF6yvTL6k&feature=related


 

" Obama’s First Order: Don’t Hurt the  pium "

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2287687/posts

 


"Afghanistan still world's top  pium supplier, despite 10 years of US-led war

Despite increased eradication efforts in Afghanistan, opium cultivation rose by 7 percent in 2011 as compared to last year, according to a new United Nations report. Production is up 61 percent."

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2011/1011/Afghanistan-still-world-s-top-opium-supplier-despite-10-years-of-US-led-war

 

The Appetite of Tyranny is never far removed from the Tyranny of the Appetite.

Marines ignore  pium — Taliban's cash crop

Marines fear locals would fight back if they destroyed the lucrative plants

updated 4:38 p.m. MT, Tues., May 6, 2008


Noting to see there. Mooove along.



Tata.

27 posted on 04/15/2012 9:24:03 AM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Scutter

That’s the question for Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. Going on 3 years for the Afghanistan surge;

Published March 13, 2012
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/13/panetta-awaits-withdrawal-plan-for-afghan-surge-forces/

As many as 23,000 troops who were part of the 2009 surge in Afghanistan are supposed to come home this fall, though Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Tuesday he was awaiting plans from Gen. John Allen, the top commander in Afghanistan, on the strategy.


32 posted on 04/15/2012 10:10:36 AM PDT by Son House (The Economic Boom Heard Around The World => TEA Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Scutter

At one point, it seemed that victory meant once we had killed Osama bin Laden. But then again, we could have argued that bin Laden was essentially crippled on the international scale, so I don’t have a clue anymore.


35 posted on 04/15/2012 2:04:01 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson