Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney-Kennedy Health Care Bill Signing (Romney praising Kennedy)(Aug 23, 2007)
YouTube.com ^ | Aug 23, 2007 | Mitt Romney

Posted on 04/16/2012 7:18:20 PM PDT by SoConPubbie

Faneuil Hall, Boston, MA, April 12, 2006

Romney previewing what we can expect if, God forbid, he wins the Presidency; His Bi-Partitianship


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: romney
"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan
"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine 1792

1 posted on 04/16/2012 7:18:42 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

While you’re at it, why don’t you get a picture of Newt sitting on the couch with Rev. Al and Nancy Pelosi... brings back memories don’t it?


2 posted on 04/16/2012 7:29:33 PM PDT by dps.inspect (the system is rigged...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Look Romney was not my first choice but you and the crew behind you that will do what ever you can to make sure he is not elected will be directly responsible for whatever crap sandwich we get from Obama. You are a fool for thinking 4 years of Obama will make your next NON-pick electable.

I don’t care if I get zotted at this point. If Romney is good enough for Dick Cheney he’s good ENOUGH for me.


3 posted on 04/16/2012 7:40:33 PM PDT by Edison (I don't know what irks me more, the lying or the incompetence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edison
directly responsible for whatever crap sandwich we get from Obama.

Who will be responsible for the crap sandwich that Romney will give us? Something tells me that the vast majority of those who blast Romney critics for voting conservative principles will disappear when the disaster of Romney becomes evident.

4 posted on 04/16/2012 8:27:56 PM PDT by CommerceComet (If Mitt can leave the GOP to protest Reagan, why can't I do the same in protest of Romney?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

The lines are drawn - Obama or Romney.

We must get rid of Obama.

Lets not dwell on Reagan’s days in the Democrat Party, his time as a Union Leader, or his signing abortion laws as Govenor.

Politicians have a bit of a moral duty to represent their constituents, beyond just the practical political necessity of staying in line with the preferences of the electorate of their time and place. Things will change for Romney as President - the USA is different from the Peoples Republic of Massachusetts. He is a clean-living competent business executive with a strong track record of success with turnaround situations. He is a Godsend compared to Obama.

Its time to lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way. The lines are drawn.


5 posted on 04/16/2012 8:44:06 PM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo
Lets not dwell on Reagan’s days in the Democrat Party, his time as a Union Leader, or his signing abortion laws as Govenor.

I dare you to find a list that comes even close to providing an equality between the past records of Reagan and Romney.

Your boy Romney has NOTHING in his actual record that recommends him to conservatives.

Reagan, except for a few flaws, was a true-blue, limited-government conservative.

Your boy as he stacks up against Newt and Obama, what you will find is an alarming similiarity in his record and issue positions BASED on his record:


6 posted on 04/16/2012 9:58:40 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo; Jim Robinson
Things will change for Romney as President - the USA is different from the Peoples Republic of Massachusetts. He is a clean-living competent business executive with a strong track record of success with turnaround situations. He is a Godsend compared to Obama.

Its time to lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way. The lines are drawn.


There are 46% of the delegates still to be won in the remaining primaries.

You are posting on a website devoted to conservatism, not the Republican party (unless they are moving in a conservative direction).

The assumption is that you are a conservative or you wouldn't be here.

Jim Robinson just broke it down to you in terms only an idiot could not understand as to why sincere conservatives would never vote for Romney.

And his analysis doesn't even factor in the myriad and continual lies that Romney tells.

And yet, here you are Promoting Mitt Romney.


What part of the following statement by Jim Robinson don't you understand?


A reminder for those who are not receiving the message:

Romney is a pathological compulsive liar. Lie after lie papered over with more lies. Doesn’t even flinch when caught in bald faced lies, simply tells another big whopper to cover up or dodge the issue. Funny thing, the man actually seems to believe his own latest lies and simply ignores the glaring record of his past actions/lies. And you have true blue establishment elite RINO Republicans like Karl Rove enabling and backing up his lies. Their motivation is simply to hang on to power (and riches) any way they can.

I’ve stated many times since Romney started running for the presidency way back when that I’d never vote for him and I will not. He cannot lie his way out of his decades long record of support for abortion, Roe v Wade, planned parenthood, gay rights, gun control, global warming, amnesty, liberal judges, big government, compulsory or socialized health care (RomneyCommieCare), mandates, Keynesian economics, support and approval of TARP, bailouts, stimulus packages, i.e, every damn liberal progressive issue that comes down the pike.

C’mon. These are the reasons the tea party sprang up and the reasons he and Rove loathe the tea party and our tea party conservative candidates. Romney famously expressed his loathing for Reagan-Bush conservatism several years ago when he was trying to run to the left of Ted Kennedy and now he’s cloaking himself in Reagan conservatism, knowing full well that it’s a lie, but he knows it’s the only way he can possibly win, er buy the Republican nomination.

Screw Romney!! I absolutely will not support or vote for a proven compulsive liar with a known record of abortion and big government socialism, liberal appointments, etc. He still lies about RomneyCommieCare today. Calls it a “conservative solution.” Get real!!

Listen to what Ronald Reagan had to say about the elites pushing socialism on America via compulsory health insurance:

Ronald Reagan speaks out against RomneyCommieCare

There will be no campaign for this Massachusetts liberal liar on FR!!

7 posted on 04/16/2012 10:05:18 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Edison
Look Romney was not my first choice but you and the crew behind you that will do what ever you can to make sure he is not elected will be directly responsible for whatever crap sandwich we get from Obama. You are a fool for thinking 4 years of Obama will make your next NON-pick electable.

I don’t care if I get zotted at this point. If Romney is good enough for Dick Cheney he’s good ENOUGH for me.


There are 46% of the delegates still to be won in the remaining primaries.

You are posting on a website devoted to conservatism, not the Republican party (unless they are moving in a conservative direction).

The assumption is that you are a conservative or you wouldn't be here.

Jim Robinson just broke it down to you in terms only an idiot could not understand as to why sincere conservatives would never vote for Romney.

And his analysis doesn't even factor in the myriad and continual lies that Romney tells.

And yet, here you are Promoting Mitt Romney.


What part of the following statement by Jim Robinson don't you understand?


A reminder for those who are not receiving the message:

Romney is a pathological compulsive liar. Lie after lie papered over with more lies. Doesn’t even flinch when caught in bald faced lies, simply tells another big whopper to cover up or dodge the issue. Funny thing, the man actually seems to believe his own latest lies and simply ignores the glaring record of his past actions/lies. And you have true blue establishment elite RINO Republicans like Karl Rove enabling and backing up his lies. Their motivation is simply to hang on to power (and riches) any way they can.

I’ve stated many times since Romney started running for the presidency way back when that I’d never vote for him and I will not. He cannot lie his way out of his decades long record of support for abortion, Roe v Wade, planned parenthood, gay rights, gun control, global warming, amnesty, liberal judges, big government, compulsory or socialized health care (RomneyCommieCare), mandates, Keynesian economics, support and approval of TARP, bailouts, stimulus packages, i.e, every damn liberal progressive issue that comes down the pike.

C’mon. These are the reasons the tea party sprang up and the reasons he and Rove loathe the tea party and our tea party conservative candidates. Romney famously expressed his loathing for Reagan-Bush conservatism several years ago when he was trying to run to the left of Ted Kennedy and now he’s cloaking himself in Reagan conservatism, knowing full well that it’s a lie, but he knows it’s the only way he can possibly win, er buy the Republican nomination.

Screw Romney!! I absolutely will not support or vote for a proven compulsive liar with a known record of abortion and big government socialism, liberal appointments, etc. He still lies about RomneyCommieCare today. Calls it a “conservative solution.” Get real!!

Listen to what Ronald Reagan had to say about the elites pushing socialism on America via compulsory health insurance:

Ronald Reagan speaks out against RomneyCommieCare

There will be no campaign for this Massachusetts liberal liar on FR!!

8 posted on 04/16/2012 10:07:16 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

So either you don’t think that Romney will get the Republican nomination, or you are determined to oppose him even if he does.

If you don’t think he will get the nomination, we can wait to have a conversation when things shake out. I have concluded that he will be. I’ve waited for a winner to emerge.

Romney was not my choice. I liked Bachman from seeing her at Tea Party rallies, the wife liked Cain, and we were both Newt fans. It would have been fun to watch a President Gingrich go after leftist organizations and funding hammer and tong, but I do not believe that it will be. I have liked Santorum since he stopped to shake my hand while I was Freeping (shouting at) Sen Lahey outside the Senate building over Juanita Broaddrick back during the Clinton Era.

I kept my powder dry until it was time to launch - I believe Santorun’s withdrwal sealed the math (for all practical purposes). I stayed out of the primary like I always do, for two reasons: 1. Avoid fratricide IAW Reagan’s 11th Commandment. 2. During my 25 years in the Army, I just always registered as an independent to avoid any partisan pressure on the job. Now that I have concluded that Romney will be the nominee, I have set my sights on beating Obama and his ilk down ticket. I will learn to love Romney’s strong points, like I learned to love W’s, because I believe that the outcome is much more important than my feelings.

After every primary, it is a challenge to bring the team back together for the general election, but that is what is needed to win (50% plus one, or 52% figuring on recounts and fraud). If it is your intent to oppose Romney no matter what, I believe that the effect is to serve Obama’s purposes. It may come down to a narrow margin in only one swing state, like Bush v. Gore did in Florida. In such a narrow contest, the sabotage of some disgruntled conservatives may be just enough to allow the left to wiggle their knife into the heart of the American Constitution for a death blow.

The caretaking of our Constitution is on watch now, and just taking our toys and going home is not an emotional luxury that we should indulge in if we are are serious about that responsibility. Obama must be defeated - he is not just some routine old-style Democrat politician. I believe that we should suck up whatever we have to to make that happen, and to do it with gusto, so as to do the absolutely best job we can.

It may simply be that I view the primary as wrapped up and you do not, which can be reasonably argued both ways. Once the nomination is wrapped up, the things that I think would be useful would be things like working for a Conservative VP or platform, filling out Republican organizations to move Conservatives up the ranks and infuse ideas, and actively working through extra-Republican organizations like TEA Parties to defeat liberals. Biterly opposing Republicans (even RINOs) after the primaries is a self-inlicted wound that I think is important to avoid.


9 posted on 04/17/2012 8:55:37 PM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson