Posted on 04/16/2012 7:18:20 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
Faneuil Hall, Boston, MA, April 12, 2006
Romney previewing what we can expect if, God forbid, he wins the Presidency; His Bi-Partitianship
"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton | |
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldnt make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan | |
"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine 1792 | |
While you’re at it, why don’t you get a picture of Newt sitting on the couch with Rev. Al and Nancy Pelosi... brings back memories don’t it?
Look Romney was not my first choice but you and the crew behind you that will do what ever you can to make sure he is not elected will be directly responsible for whatever crap sandwich we get from Obama. You are a fool for thinking 4 years of Obama will make your next NON-pick electable.
I don’t care if I get zotted at this point. If Romney is good enough for Dick Cheney he’s good ENOUGH for me.
Who will be responsible for the crap sandwich that Romney will give us? Something tells me that the vast majority of those who blast Romney critics for voting conservative principles will disappear when the disaster of Romney becomes evident.
The lines are drawn - Obama or Romney.
We must get rid of Obama.
Lets not dwell on Reagan’s days in the Democrat Party, his time as a Union Leader, or his signing abortion laws as Govenor.
Politicians have a bit of a moral duty to represent their constituents, beyond just the practical political necessity of staying in line with the preferences of the electorate of their time and place. Things will change for Romney as President - the USA is different from the Peoples Republic of Massachusetts. He is a clean-living competent business executive with a strong track record of success with turnaround situations. He is a Godsend compared to Obama.
Its time to lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way. The lines are drawn.
So either you don’t think that Romney will get the Republican nomination, or you are determined to oppose him even if he does.
If you don’t think he will get the nomination, we can wait to have a conversation when things shake out. I have concluded that he will be. I’ve waited for a winner to emerge.
Romney was not my choice. I liked Bachman from seeing her at Tea Party rallies, the wife liked Cain, and we were both Newt fans. It would have been fun to watch a President Gingrich go after leftist organizations and funding hammer and tong, but I do not believe that it will be. I have liked Santorum since he stopped to shake my hand while I was Freeping (shouting at) Sen Lahey outside the Senate building over Juanita Broaddrick back during the Clinton Era.
I kept my powder dry until it was time to launch - I believe Santorun’s withdrwal sealed the math (for all practical purposes). I stayed out of the primary like I always do, for two reasons: 1. Avoid fratricide IAW Reagan’s 11th Commandment. 2. During my 25 years in the Army, I just always registered as an independent to avoid any partisan pressure on the job. Now that I have concluded that Romney will be the nominee, I have set my sights on beating Obama and his ilk down ticket. I will learn to love Romney’s strong points, like I learned to love W’s, because I believe that the outcome is much more important than my feelings.
After every primary, it is a challenge to bring the team back together for the general election, but that is what is needed to win (50% plus one, or 52% figuring on recounts and fraud). If it is your intent to oppose Romney no matter what, I believe that the effect is to serve Obama’s purposes. It may come down to a narrow margin in only one swing state, like Bush v. Gore did in Florida. In such a narrow contest, the sabotage of some disgruntled conservatives may be just enough to allow the left to wiggle their knife into the heart of the American Constitution for a death blow.
The caretaking of our Constitution is on watch now, and just taking our toys and going home is not an emotional luxury that we should indulge in if we are are serious about that responsibility. Obama must be defeated - he is not just some routine old-style Democrat politician. I believe that we should suck up whatever we have to to make that happen, and to do it with gusto, so as to do the absolutely best job we can.
It may simply be that I view the primary as wrapped up and you do not, which can be reasonably argued both ways. Once the nomination is wrapped up, the things that I think would be useful would be things like working for a Conservative VP or platform, filling out Republican organizations to move Conservatives up the ranks and infuse ideas, and actively working through extra-Republican organizations like TEA Parties to defeat liberals. Biterly opposing Republicans (even RINOs) after the primaries is a self-inlicted wound that I think is important to avoid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.