Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Semper911; All
It looks like this is the third court challenge and the first that the Senate has joined:

Federal Court in N.Y. Won't Rule on Obama Recess Appointments - WSJ.com)

March 28, 2012

A federal judge in New York declined to rule on whether President Barack Obama's recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board violate the U.S. Constitution, leaving the widely debated question unresolved for now. The decision marked the second time a court has declined to rule on the matter.

The first legal challenge to the appointments was made in January. The judge overseeing that case, which challenged an NLRB regulation that was approved last year before the recess appointments, also declined to rule on the constitutionality question. That judge said the regulation was created by a quorum of "undisputedly" authorized board members well before the recess appointments were announced. Several other cases are pending that challenge the recess appointments, though it's unclear when and if those will be decided.

19 posted on 04/17/2012 8:54:03 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DBeers

My question: by what authority did the judge “decline” to rule? Is that like nobama deciding to not support DOMA?


21 posted on 04/17/2012 9:03:09 PM PDT by upchuck (Need is not an acceptable lifestyle choice; dependent is not a career. ~ Dr. Tim Nerenz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson