Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heads Begin to Roll in Secret Service Sex Scandal
PJ Media ^ | 4-18-2012 | Bridget Johnson

Posted on 04/18/2012 6:22:32 PM PDT by smoothsailing

April 18, 2012

Heads Begin to Roll in Secret Service Sex Scandal

Bridget Johnson

Three Secret Service agents became the first to fall in the Colombian prostitution scandal today, with the agency announcing that two supervisors and one agent will step down.

Eight more remain under investigation and on suspension as one of the supervisors retired, the other was “proposed for removal for cause” (which can be challenged), and the agent resigned.

“The Secret Service continues to conduct a full, thorough and fair investigation, utilizing all investigative techniques available to our agency,” the assistant director of the U.S. Secret Service Office of Government and Public Affairs, Paul Morrissey, said in a statement. “This includes polygraph examinations, interviews with the employees involved, and witness interviews, to include interviews being conducted by our Office of Professional Responsibility in Cartagena, Colombia.”

Over on the Hill, the chairman and ranking member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee wrote the Secret Service director, Mark J. Sullivan, a letter that accused the agents of bringing the prostitutes into contact with “sensitive security information.”

The letter was first released to ABC News’ Jake Tapper, then Rep. Darrell Issa (Calif.) tweeted a copy.

Issa and Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) noted that Sullivan briefed members early this week on “steps the agency has taken to investigate this matter and your plans for preventing a recurrence.”

“The facts as you described them raised questions about the agency’s culture,” the congressmen wrote. “The incident in Cartagena is troubling because Secret Service agents and officers made a range of bad decisions, from drinking too much, to engaging with prostitutes, to bringing foreign nationals into contact with sensitive security information, to exposing themselves to blackmail and other forms of potential compromise.”

The committee leaders then asked Sullivan for 10 things to aid the Oversight investigation, including a detailed description of events and timeline, an accounting of all U.S. government personnel who knew about the incident, and the agency’s investigative findings including information received from Colombian authorities.

Issa and Cummings also want the disciplinary histories of the agents involved dating back 10 years, and summaries of any other disciplinary actions that were taken against any other personnel as a result of misconduct on overseas trips since 2007.

“Has the USSS been able to determine that all women involved in this incident were at least 18 years of age?” the letter asks, noting that the involvement of underage prostitutes violates the law under which a U.S. citizen traveling to a foreign locale cannot engage in “illicit sexual conduct.”

“Your swift and decisive action in response to this scandal has given us confidence that the agency will complete a thorough investigation and take steps to ensure that similar lapses in judgment will never again jeopardize the important work of the U.S. Secret Service.”

Issa and Cummings told Sullivan that “your task is to restore the world’s confidence in the U.S. Secret Service.”

The New York Times got the first interview with the prostitute whose argument over payment led to the discovery of the activities of the Secret Service agents and a handful of military personnel under investigation by the Department of Defense.

She claimed she was a high-priced escort and charged the agent $800 when he offered only $30. She also noted that not only did she spend the entire night in the agent’s room, only to be woken by a call from the front desk, but when she wanted help getting her money she fetched another prostitute who had stayed the whole night with an agent across the hall.

The woman told the Times that she was not interested in cooperating with American investigators and is planning to leave Cartagena soon.

Talking with reporters en route to a President Obama speech in Ohio today, White House spokesman Jay Carney said that the scandal wasn’t detracting from Obama’s economic message and quest to cast government as a force for good.

“The president has been crystal clear since he was a candidate about the standards that he insists be met by those who work for the federal government and on behalf of the American people and for the American people,” Carney said.

“You have heard the president speak recently on the matter involving the Secret Service. I don’t have anything to add to that.”


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hookergate; pay2pley; pleygate; secretservicescandal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: smoothsailing
"The woman told the Times that she was not interested in cooperating with American investigators and is planning to leave Cartagena soon."

She has appointments in Caracas and Havana, no doubt...although it sounds like she's already been "debriefed."

21 posted on 04/18/2012 7:02:21 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

Sounds like the others did come up with the cash AFTER all the commotion had already started.


22 posted on 04/18/2012 7:05:52 PM PDT by potlatch (~~And the truth IS what counts, RIGHT ? ~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: South Dakota

I don’t know. I think there would be more people inclined to spill the beans now.
Thoughts


23 posted on 04/18/2012 7:06:38 PM PDT by mel (There are only 2 races decent and undecent people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: South Dakota

I don’t know. I think there would be more people inclined to spill the beans now.
Thoughts


24 posted on 04/18/2012 7:06:38 PM PDT by mel (There are only 2 races decent and undecent people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: South Dakota

I don’t know. I think there would be more people inclined to spill the beans now.
Thoughts


25 posted on 04/18/2012 7:06:52 PM PDT by mel (There are only 2 races decent and undecent people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

These guys sound more like SEIU goons than SS agents. Sheesh.


26 posted on 04/18/2012 7:08:15 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; Repub4bush

This Thread Is Useless Without Pictures


27 posted on 04/18/2012 7:11:11 PM PDT by Third Person
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; Repub4bush

This Thread Is Useless Without Pictures


28 posted on 04/18/2012 7:11:11 PM PDT by Third Person
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; Repub4bush

This Thread Is Useless Without Pictures


29 posted on 04/18/2012 7:11:23 PM PDT by Third Person
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: South Dakota

That’s the most interesting angle I’ve heard yet, sounds very plausible. The USSS works for the fedgov, not the president directly, with one of their tasks being security for the POTUS. I could see obama generating a scandal to discredit the USSS to put forward the case to install his own personally assigned security detail. It follows the playbook of countless dictators worldwide.


30 posted on 04/18/2012 7:12:32 PM PDT by factoryrat (e are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

GD iPad triple post!


31 posted on 04/18/2012 7:12:48 PM PDT by Third Person
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Yeah, they messed up big time! Now they may lose their prestigious jobs.........and their ‘happy homes’.
32 posted on 04/18/2012 7:15:10 PM PDT by potlatch (~~And the truth IS what counts, RIGHT ? ~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

Thanks, now I get it! :)


33 posted on 04/18/2012 7:19:47 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

0bama is now going to have a select group of agents surrounding him. They will be totally loyal to him and will “Hear no evil, see no evil and speak no evil”.

Is’s like a ‘Coup’ in progress.


34 posted on 04/18/2012 7:19:57 PM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

So sorry!


35 posted on 04/18/2012 7:22:15 PM PDT by Third Person
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Third Person

This Thread Is Useless Without Pictures


Will Helen Thomas in a bikini do?


36 posted on 04/18/2012 7:22:53 PM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: unkus

From what I’ve read in some articles, these men were there to secure the hotel and area, they aren’t the SS men who personally surround and protect the President.


37 posted on 04/18/2012 7:24:42 PM PDT by potlatch (~~And the truth IS what counts, RIGHT ? ~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

i’ve met 2 secret service types over the years (through friends)... and they both seemed just this side of monks. good guys. very cream of the crop.

i’m sorry, but i don’t believe this whole thing. something’s wrong. feels like a setup to oust a certain crew and put another, more favored crew into position.

seems very fishy


38 posted on 04/18/2012 7:29:07 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

You’re right. But it’s all fishy. I stand by surrounding himself with loyal agents. We’re no longer living in a Republic. We’re in a totally corrupt Oligarchy with no accountability for the elite.


39 posted on 04/18/2012 7:29:17 PM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; unkus
From what I’ve read in some articles, these men were there to secure the hotel and area, they aren’t the SS men who personally surround and protect the President.

That's my understanding as well. This took place three or four days before TOTUS arrived in Columbia. These were advance team guys, not "body" guys. Of course, Zero could use this as an excuse to replace everyone assigned to the Presidential detail.

40 posted on 04/18/2012 7:32:46 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson