When we resort to name-calling and anger we are NO better than the progressives who have no argument but to blame, bait and name-call. Seriously is it really important to call out someone who has only been here a short-time? Are we now claiming entitlements based on how long we have been here? This should be a forum for realistic and rational debate.
That being said...
It is TRUE the nomination process is NOT over.
It is TRUE Newt is still in the process.
It is Illogical to believe that Newt can mount enough momentum to overcome Mitt or stop his nomination. I don’t even know if it is a mathematical possibility, but even if it were there would have to be a momentous shift in the remaining electorate. For Newt I just don’t see this happening.
I don’t like Mitt...I voted for Newt in my primary. I could (like many here) list all the reasons NOT to vote for Mitt. However, I dislike the current administration more than I dislike Mitt.
The mission is now change the occupancy of the White House. We must get behind that mission and stop the “WE HATE MITT” banners. Two months ago that was fine, but not now. The anti-mitt rehetoric, at this point, makes no sense unless you are trying to convince people to not vote for Mitt at the expense of losing more of our freedom by allowing the current President to stay.
“We must get behind that mission and stop the “WE HATE MITT” banners”
Why? The Conservative Cause is clearly served by an Obama re-election rather than a Romney win.
A Right leaning/Conservative Congress can easily remain united behind an Obama re-election....whereas the same Congress will be sliced and diced by the RINOS if Romney is in the White House.
The Powers That Be fully understand this....
Also, please try to understand our reluctance to genuflect at the altar of your self-importance.
I will never stop, TYVM. Mitt is a worthless Marxist. If he wins the nomination, libertarians like me have already lost and authoritarians have won. And you Mitt supporters can “line up behind him” all you want - count me out.