“I was going to post a reasonable reply to your post here but then decided to go back through your posting history on this thread and see how the conversations went, and decided against it.”
If your post was reasonable and intelligent (like this one) then you wouldn’t end up like Tiger. I have no desire to lambast good people. Tiger made erroneous accusations which he couldn’t defend and then resorted to logical fallacies and name calling when challenged on it. Instead of just accept the fact that he was wrong he continued to press...so I gave him what he deserved.
Regarding the rest of this post, I’ve already said it’s no question this guy was compromised in some way and that what he did was wrong. That’s not the point. The point is does the charges levied against him and the potential punishment fit the crime? He should be accountable for something, but 12 counts of felony charges and a potential for 60 year imprisonment? Common; I refuse to believe you aren’t alarmed by this or find this acceptable.
Furthermore, does anyone even know what really transpired? It’s easy to pass judgment when all you’ve been told is a tiny sliver of the facts by an anti-gun sympathetic media. All I’ve done is implore people to take a deep breath and look at the frailty of the notions they’ve been led to believe and the gross abuse of justice and its misappropriation.
After I read the article and ran what I knew over in my mind…I was outraged…not at the teacher but the failure of the justice system and media.
Compromised? I don't think that word means what you think it means.
This is a forum. (not a blog) We discuss what is known to us not what might be. Or do you think there should be no discussion at all until the whole case is tried and finished?
After I read the article and ran what I knew over in my mind…I was outraged…not at the teacher but the failure of the justice system and media.
Oh, but you can make that judgment without "knowing what really transpired?" Typical arrogant double standard of the statist wannabe.