No the military's job is to fight. It isn't intended to be a political organ.
My understanding is that until he talked about Obama’s eligibility he was told he was fine.
As a self-identified military guy he wasn't fine. Using a gov't computer wasn't fine. Continuing after being counseled wasn't fine despite the sea lawyer's advice.
I have merely suggested that due process be done. If it was, this guy would be in jail rather than in the White House.
But it wasn't, I wish it had been, I wish I was taller. What is your remedy?
I have never suggested that a military officer make his own determination.
Of course you have, those military guys that went to court and got smushed did just that, to no effect. It isn't an approach that can work.
we have judicial, criminal, and administrative indications that he cannot lawfully act as President
And yet no proof that can meet the bar set for such determinations.
The proof is available. What isn’t available is a system that will allow the proof to even matter.
We’ve already got two judges in ballot challenges who have given basically “judge’s knowledge” as the basis for ruling that Obama is eligible to be on state ballots, ruling for Obama even though absolutely no evidence was ever presented for his age, residency, current US citizenship, place of birth, or parentage - all of which are necessary to establish Presidential eligibility.
I don’t know about you, but I don’t like these sharia rulings. They spit on due process.
The military’s job is to fight when properly authorized. No?
My remedy is what I’m working on: law enforcement and informing the public. Both are taken hostage to a certain point.
The only real law enforcement being done in this country at this point is at the state and local levels, which means that only state and local crimes can be tried. To get the feds involved while Eric Holder is the fox guarding the henhouse, Congress would have to authorize an independent investigation. Their souls are dead; they will never do that.
At this point the public is too busy making ends meet to listen to anything beyond the 1-minute-on-the-hour “news” from the hostage media - and I mean that literally; Mike Zullo and Doug Hagman have both spoken to the witnesses and Hagman has other material evidence corroborating their claims that on-air personalities were threatened if they reported on Obama’s eligibility, and now there is evidence also that Glenn Beck left Fox because he was doing too much to expose Obama/Soros’ lawless connections to both communists and Islamists - which didn’t go over well with one of the Fox Bd of Directors members who has a financial stake with Soros - so Fox wouldn’t protect Beck’s lower staffers from the death threats being constantly made.
And at this point even if people were informed well enough to vote against Obama, what matters is who counts the votes, and as I just mentioned to somebody else, the electronic voting systems are not being audited; there is nothing to stop widespread election fraud.
I also believe, as I mentioned before, that the US is vulnerable to attacks that would signal US’s Arab Spring to begin with Hezbollah operatives taking over all state capitols and DC - and that if any of the polling suggested that Obama wouldn’t win an election, they would use any of those 3 events (or possibly others, that I’m not going to talk about) to trigger the final communist-Islamist coup. Our troops are being shot at in Afghanistan; they’re not here.
So basically the solution it will probably come down to is the guns that people like you and me have, and our willingness to use them against Hezbollah operatives. Fear of those guns may be what has kept Obama/Soros from initiating the final coup already.
So Constitutional answers? I don’t think the Constitution provides for the situation we’re in, except through the 2nd Amendment. Which is what the Trayvon Martin case is working to undo.
What’s your solution?