Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Private Space Plane Aims to Pick Up Where NASA's Shuttles Left Off
SPACE.com ^ | 25 April 2012 Time: 07:00 AM ET | Denise Chow

Posted on 04/26/2012 1:19:10 PM PDT by Josh Painter

The new spaceship being built by private aerospace firm Sierra Nevada Corp. may look like a miniature space shuttle, but while the design takes cues from the past, company officials are hoping this vehicle shepherds in a new era of commercial human spaceflight.

Sierra Nevada's Dream Chaser space plane is being developed to take astronauts to and from the International Space Station in low-Earth orbit. The company is aiming to begin full orbital flights in 2016.

But the Dream Chaser design, which is reminiscent of NASA's space shuttle, is actually based on a concept vehicle, called HL-20, which was first looked at by the agency in the early 1980s.

"We took it out of the NASA attic," Mark Sirangelo, chairman of Sierra Nevada, told reporters this month at the 28th National Space Symposium. "We think, in many ways, it's a terrific story. Not many things that NASA puts away — or really any federal agency puts away for a long time — comes out and gets to see the light of day again and gets to be built. We're pretty proud of that."

Using the HL-20 as a foundation, Sierra Nevada crafted a new and modern spacecraft that will launch initially on one of the United Launch Alliance's Atlas 5 rockets and land on a conventional runway at the end of its mission. Sirangelo said, however, that other rocket options will be considered in the future, as other options become available.

A commercial space company called SpaceDev announced plans to build the Dream Chaser vehicle in 2004. The company was later acquired by Sierra Nevada, which is celebrating its 25th anniversary this year, and the HL-20 concept became the basis of the vehicle's design.

(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...


TOPICS: Technical
KEYWORDS: iss; nasa; shuttle; space
Dream Chaser
1 posted on 04/26/2012 1:19:18 PM PDT by Josh Painter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

space ping (hope I did that right.)


2 posted on 04/26/2012 1:26:18 PM PDT by perplyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

LOL. There is so much I want to say about how the “government” (a euphemism in this case) just can’t keep a “good man” down, but I will bite my tongue. There is a way around the determination of certain people to bring all down to the lowest common denominator (ie the “crabs in a barrel” effect) as long as there’s a way to keep their paws off the money.


3 posted on 04/26/2012 1:28:06 PM PDT by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Dream Chaser Infographic
4 posted on 04/26/2012 1:28:18 PM PDT by Josh Painter ("We will not save our country by becoming like the left." - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Don’t see a crew escape system.


5 posted on 04/26/2012 1:37:57 PM PDT by FReepaholic (Stupidity is not a crime, so you're free to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Next gen Executive Jet


6 posted on 04/26/2012 1:38:58 PM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

I like the location of the docking hatch as the hardware there can be used to attach it to the booster (makes it lighter) as well as not needing TPS (Thermal Protection System) over an opening hatch.

It is a clever design and example of efficient engineering.

I am assuming this would be launched on TOP of a SpaceX dragon or maybe later some sort of Burt Rutan type carrier vehicle.


7 posted on 04/26/2012 1:40:19 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FReepaholic

[ Don’t see a crew escape system. ]

Doesn’t bloody need one if it is on top of “stack”. Unlike the shuttle which was sitting underneath/beside a huge tank of liquid H2 and O2.

If the two rockets on either side of the docking hatch can fire during launch to pull the orbiter ahead of the stack should the stack malfunction it will be LOADS more safe than the Space Shuttle.


8 posted on 04/26/2012 1:43:25 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter
I wish PlanetSpace could have had a chance to fly their Silver Dart to orbit. It's designed to carry eight people to LEO.

9 posted on 04/26/2012 1:47:09 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

According to the article, they’ll use an Atlas V booster for the initial flights.


10 posted on 04/26/2012 1:47:38 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter
After comparing the size and weight of the two craft, it seems that the most efficient launch technique would be from atop a 747.


11 posted on 04/26/2012 1:52:52 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
Some aircraft(spacecraft) make it, and some don't. Sometimes for stupid reasons. Think Avro Arrow. I think it would have been a game changer, but Canada killed it in the cradle.

On the up side, the designers and engineers and assemblers gained the knowledge of what they did, and the mistakes they made, And that real-world experience is important for the human race to keep current. Especially in the US.

/johnny

12 posted on 04/26/2012 1:54:40 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

P.S. A 747 could carry four of these new spaceplanes under it’s wings.


13 posted on 04/26/2012 1:55:22 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter
To pick up where Shuttle program left off

As follow-on widow maker? Killing astronauts a half dozen at time?

14 posted on 04/26/2012 2:05:42 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter
from 1966...

15 posted on 04/26/2012 4:06:03 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
...Doesn’t bloody need one if it is on top of “stack”...

Right. So why did the Mercury and Gemini spacecraft have one? Why is the Orion gonna have one?

...If the two rockets on either side of the docking hatch can fire during launch to pull the orbiter ahead of the stack should the stack malfunction...

That's the Orbital Maneuvering System.

16 posted on 04/26/2012 6:11:24 PM PDT by FReepaholic (Stupidity is not a crime, so you're free to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chode

"Gentlemen, we can rebuild it. We have the technology. We have the capability to build the world's first commercial space plane. Dream Chaser will be that space plane. Better than it was before. Better, stronger, faster."

17 posted on 04/27/2012 7:11:09 PM PDT by anymouse (God didn't write this sitcom we call life, he's just the critic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
outstanding!!!
18 posted on 04/27/2012 7:54:13 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson