Well, my friend, it appears you have some serious issues with the way I run FR and the goals I’ve set for this site. If you do not know by now that I am pro-life, pro-family, pro-liberty, etc, and that the abortionist/homosexualist/statist Mitt Romney will never be acceptable to me as a presidential candidate then you’re nuts. And if you think I’m going to open up FR as an all inclusive, big tent abortionist/homosexualist/statist site just to increase our hits you’re doubly nuts. And if you think I would do any of the above for money you’re triply nuts.
My positions on God, life, family, liberty and country are non-negotiable and not open to debate. They are what they are and they’re posted on our front page and at the top of every index page: “Welcome to Free Republic, America’s exclusive site for God, Family, Country, Life & Liberty conservatives!”
You must’ve seen this when you registered and or when you login every day, so if you wish to walk some other path, I don’t know why you bother signing in.
So I’ll repeat for your benefit which I’ve posted many times before, if you find FR is not your cup of tea, just move along because we’re not changing it to suit you.
As with all anti-freepers now harping from the peanut galleries, we got a long fine before we met you, we’ll get along fine without you.
But just to show there are no hard feelings if you do go, I’ll leave you with this parting message:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1ZKIX0ICZo
No, Jim, I don’t have any hard feelings at all, and I’m not an anti-freeper or retread.
I still love this site and all it has done to help me understand today’s world of politics, and I am not asking you to change your principles. I just question some of this site’s strategy in promoting these principles, and many of my complaints have nothing to do with you or management.
I’ll probably take a long break after posting this and may never come back again, but in the meantime, I sincerely wish you good luck in keeping this site afloat.
It was nice while it lasted.
Bye.
Good.
I don't really know any authentic conservatives, patriots who'd want you to--at least not off the top of my head.
I would appreciate some help with how to respond, though to the following.
I also don't know anyone who thinks that OThuga and Marxist Mitt are identically 100% equal in their destructiveness toward:
A) God
B) Life
C) Family
D) The Constitution
E) Freedom
F) The health of the Republic of the US of A
G) Homosexuality
H) abortion, planned genocide, euthanasia, UN agenda 21,
I) Big government
J) satanic Marxist NWO global government
K) Islam
etc.
I don't know how even I'd rate the two traitors on the above . . . whether I'd rate OThuga 100% and Marxist Mitt 95% destructive or OThuga 100% and Marxist Mitt 85% or what. But I would rate OThuga very detectably worse than Mitt.
And I know a lot of people--sometimes including the one in my mirror on some days--who cannot rationalize doing anything to contribute to OThuga--A WORSE DESTROYER on all the things we hold dear--getting into office another 4 years.
The Supreme Court issue is a serious concern to many of my loved ones on such scores.
Personally, I still do not think it makes a significant bit of difference how we vote. I believe the puppet masters control enough of the voting machines and other corrupt vote rigging practices that they will install whomever they have selected for the next 4 years.
Nevertheless, I believe that we are duty bound before God to exercise our right to vote as prayerfully and logically and patriotically in behalf of our cherished values as well as we can. This issue is just very troubling--sometimes to me and certainly to several I love. How can we rationally justify doing ANYTHING that results in the WORST of the two satanic evil Marxist weasels another 4 years?
I'm really not being cheeky. I'm seriously seeking your wisdom and advice on this conundrum. OThuga is sooooo demonized, sold out to Marxism and satanic Islam . . . that sometimes he makes ANYONE else seem like they are Marxist lite.
Normally, I don't have that much trouble deciding between damned if we do and damned if we don't double bind conundrums. But this one has me a bit stumped.