Mitt has some explaining to do. I hope this top adviser is wrong.
To: raulgomez05
Are they really that out of touch with their base, and what they think of Obama’s bailouts? If so, we’re in big trouble.
2 posted on
04/28/2012 4:40:19 PM PDT by
Cherokee Conservative
(If a tree falls over in the woods, and then snaps back upright as a joke, do the squirrels laugh?)
To: raulgomez05
The rooster takes credit for the sunrise too.
3 posted on
04/28/2012 4:43:19 PM PDT by
Farmer Dean
(stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
To: raulgomez05
4 posted on
04/28/2012 4:43:51 PM PDT by
RonDog
To: raulgomez05
First Romney/Obamacare, now we have more taxpayer dollars with Romney/Obama auto bailouts. These two are one and the same. If Romney wins (God forbid) we’ll still have four more years of Obama.
Lord help us!
5 posted on
04/28/2012 4:45:49 PM PDT by
mardi59
(THE REBELLION IS ON!!!)
To: raulgomez05
while he’s at it he should take credit for tarp too. he’s toast if he believes that’s a good idea.
To: raulgomez05
We have passed the rubicon, no turning back, it really doesn’t matter who wins the election....
7 posted on
04/28/2012 4:47:46 PM PDT by
stockpirate
(Romney, Ann Coulter & our ruling republican elites, are Big Government socialists, Grand Ole Sociali)
To: raulgomez05
I can’t stand Mitt, but I can’t believe he would stiff the bondholders in favor of the unions.
To: raulgomez05
One of Mitt Romney's top advisers said Saturday that President Obama's decision to bailout Chrysler and General Motors was actually Romney's idea.
And that's why America is in deep trouble no matter who wins this November. Romney might - might - be better than Obama on energy and a few other domestic issues. But Romney, like Obama, is a true believer in the power of government to "get things done". A GOP majority in one and possibly both houses of Congress means Obama will never get another major legislative initiative accomplished. Romney will, and his legislation will for the most part be indistinguishable from Obama's. And the GOP will tell conservatives to shut up and like it.
To: raulgomez05
Mitt has some explaining to do. 20 years in politics as a multifaced liberal socialist hack pretending to be a conservative and NOW he has some explaining to do?
13 posted on
04/28/2012 4:57:05 PM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: raulgomez05
Pres. Bush started the bailout of both GM & Chrysler
To: raulgomez05
And this idiot thinks this is a plus for Romney, Why?
18 posted on
04/28/2012 6:43:45 PM PDT by
calex59
To: raulgomez05
19 posted on
04/28/2012 7:18:09 PM PDT by
hecht
(Murray use your coaster)
To: raulgomez05
20 posted on
04/28/2012 7:30:51 PM PDT by
tomkat
(para bellum)
To: raulgomez05
It is a lie. Romney's only support for a "managed bankruptcy" was through private lenders. Problem was, the financial system was in panic at the time, GM was melting down, and there was no private money available. None. This has since been confirmed by numerous Wall Street sources. The only possibility was a government supported bailout, which Romney opposed. If you don't understand this, you shouldn't pretend that you do. Taken from another poster and this is the way it was.
To: raulgomez05
The bailout was popular with many people, and “bankruptcy” was a dirty word to them. Opposing the bailout was one of the few times Romney actually took a principled conservative position that could have cost him votes.
And now he’s giving the Etch-A-Sketch a shake and trying to pretend it didn’t happen.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
