Replies

Mitt Romney is a member of the Church of Jesus Chris of Latter Day Saints (LDS or Mormons). Members of the LDS profess to be nominally Christian, although some of their doctrine is certainly unconventional. Majority of LDS members I know are well centered with a good moral compass.

Obama is clearly and demonstrably by his day to day actions profoundly anti Christ (although he is most certainly not THE Anti Christ foretold in the Bible) and antagonistic and hostile to the Church and to people of the Christian faith.

You imply that you would prefer to vote for a President who has proven time and time again to be anti Christ and hostile to Christians as opposed to Mitt Romney who.

I don't get it. I can understand a certain animus to Romney for good reason based on past actions but at least Romney is not hostile to other Christians who do not share his beliefs and Romney professes to be a Christian according to his beliefs.

Romney has also pledged to respect most, if not all, of the Church's positions including right to life issues if he is elected President.

Obama, on the other hand, is anti Christ, anti Christian and hostile to the Christian Church and it's members. He has proven to be a enthusiastic member in good standing of the Cult of Death on a broad range of issues whenever the opportunity arises.

Obama's full support for the killing of babies who are born alive after failed attempts at abortion and other forms of infanticide crosses the line from metaphysical debate to outright support of a form of behavior singled out for special condemnation by Jesus himself.

Romney may not be the perfect angel, but Obama is a perfect candidate to be best defined by that timeless test suggested in the Bible - "By their fruits you shall know them" in the context and spirit of the phrase .