Barack Hussein Obama is everything you and the other soil people are arguing for. His father was a foreign hater of the US, but according to you that is exactly what the Framers meant by NBC: the son of a foreign enemy of the Republic.
I listed a few, a very few, of the things Obama has done that no other president has done. Not one other president in the history of this country has done any of those things. Are you seriously arguing that there is no/zero connection between Obama being half-foreign and all the things I listed? Seriously?
Okay then. Your turn. List the things Obama has done to justify your belief that he’s what the Framers had in mind. I.e.: you think they would have been delighted to have the son of a foreign enemy of the Republic at the country’s helm. [Do you seriously believe that, or do you just argue that position because you’re bored and have nothing better to do?] What has Hussein done to validate this weird faith of the Framers in the children of foreign enemies of the USA? Please be specific and thorough. I’m anxious to read your list.
PS: One other ‘historic’ first w Obama. He’s the first POTUS to dedicate his auto-bio to a man who passionately hated the US. But that’s just a freakish coincidence, isn’t it? Just a strange, odd, quirky little coincidence.
Unfortunately, as much as I love reading your well-written jousts FW, I believe you are wasting your time here, as Tublecane has, from what I've read of their posts on previous threads, no problem with the concept of an "anchor baby" president either.
The idea of undivided loyalty to the US as an eligibility requirement escapes them for some reason. . .