Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama, Romney tied at 46%
Gallup ^ | 5/2/12 | Gallup

Posted on 05/02/2012 10:51:42 AM PDT by pabianice

With six months to go.

(Excerpt) Read more at gallup.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: varmintman

Mitt is genuinely worrisome. He is talking a pretty fair conservative line right now, but the flip-flopping “God” of the LDS does not exactly encourage its churchmen (Mitt’s a bishop) to avoid flip flopping themselves. If elected, will he hear a “divine voice” next year telling him to back off of all that conservatism?

However, Barack Obama seems hell bent on being a tyrant. There is slop in the system and Barack Obama seems to be intent on using every inch of that slop to consolidate power to himself and use it leftily.


21 posted on 05/02/2012 11:12:41 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Away with them and the high horses they rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I take this as good news, because a President is always better known than his challenger.


22 posted on 05/02/2012 11:13:03 AM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

The rule of thumb is that undecideds always break against the incumbent. The incumbent needs to have at least 50% support going in to the final month or he is in trouble.

For comparison, Jimmy Carter’s average approval rating was 45.5%.


23 posted on 05/02/2012 11:15:43 AM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

Bad juju for Obama. The main hope Obama would have is that a third party would be so popular it renders Romney unable to prevail.


24 posted on 05/02/2012 11:15:56 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Away with them and the high horses they rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Don't worry people. Virgil Goode will take care of that ugly "tie" thing

I like Virgil Goode and the Consitution Party platform. However, Chuck Baldwin polled .19% nationally in 2008; why would we expect Goode to do any better? Even if he does "better", he would have to increase his vote percentage by 500% to even reach 1% in the final tally.

25 posted on 05/02/2012 11:15:56 AM PDT by TonyInOhio (- bursting with adequesence -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio

The people most familiar with how Mitt Romney governs (Massachusetts) would be the least likely to complain about it.


26 posted on 05/02/2012 11:17:50 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Away with them and the high horses they rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PLD

No matter how you slice it, or wish differently, one of those two is going to win.

Romney was not my first choice, but he’s not a socialist. He might turn out to be a ‘crony capitalist’, but he’s not a socialist.

Too bad Rick Perry was not ready for prime time.


27 posted on 05/02/2012 11:23:17 AM PDT by LibFreeUSA (Pick Your Poison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
And that adjustment occurs even before one considers that this poll records registered voters. The numbers would improve even more for likely voters.

The presidential race is a race for states and the demographics in the tossup states do not favor Obama by race and ethnic breakdown as much as they do in the solid blue states. In other words, he will shoot off a lot of his demographic ammunition in states he has already won, leaving an adjustment in these numbers even more in favor of Romney.

Obama's internals must be frightening indeed and that is why he is over the top on this anniversary of the assassination of Osama bin Laden.


28 posted on 05/02/2012 11:27:31 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota
We are about to measure the attention span and credulity of the US voter.

Most don't have a clue. They're interested in who's promising them the shiniest bling.

29 posted on 05/02/2012 11:29:14 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... so should voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
why would we expect Goode to do any better?

I'm being sarcastic. I don't expect Goode to peel too many votes away from Romney.

However, he could peel just enough votes from Romney to throw Virginia to Obama.

Virgil Goode Polling 5% in Virginia

30 posted on 05/02/2012 11:31:23 AM PDT by Drew68 (I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7
The rule of thumb is that undecideds always break against the incumbent.

We'll see how undecideds go when a wad of "Obama munny" is dangled in front of them.

31 posted on 05/02/2012 11:32:18 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... so should voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA
I know and i agree!!!

I do like Rick Perry Perry but never thought he would make it as far as he did..He is my governor and hope to keep him until he is ready for President..

My choice was Newt Gingrich!

32 posted on 05/02/2012 11:36:09 AM PDT by PLD (It is time the freeloaders leave the white house and go back to the hell hole where they came from..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: varmintman

I know it’s cliche’ but can you imagine the headlines, nightly cable memes etc. if the parties were reversed?

Romney would be a ‘fatally flawed/wounded incumbent’ below 50% in the polls etc.

A toss-up contest is Team Obama’s worst nightmare because it gives them no clue where to concentrate their efforts. As a result, they must spend much more in time, money and pandering trying to shore up support on multiple fronts.


33 posted on 05/02/2012 11:38:36 AM PDT by relictele (We are officially OUT of other people's money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
The most dangerous 2 months in American history will be those between BO’s loss on November 6 and that day in January 2013 when his successor takes the oath.

Prepare also for the shrill, shrieking, daily lecturing tirades from the mainstream media about what an Eeeeeevil, Raaaaaacist, Selfish, Stupid, Ungrateful country we are.
34 posted on 05/02/2012 11:40:25 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Mitt hasn’t even been formally proclaimed the GOP candidate yet

Correct and the public hasn't really been introduced to Romney yet.

He may actually look good to especially indies and his wife will be an asset IMO. She's fairly well-spoken and seems to like being interviewed.

In addition, even though I don't like Romney, I think he will appear well in debates vs. Hussein.

35 posted on 05/02/2012 11:42:25 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

This may be a race between 100% awful vs 99% awful. Expect a lot of undecideds until election day.


36 posted on 05/02/2012 11:44:24 AM PDT by Paradox (I want Obama defeated. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

If Bork Obunga gets re-elected, it’s over, there will not be any pieces lying around four years later for anybody to pick up or try to put back together. Charles Krauthammer meanwhile has stated that there wouldn’t be a dime’s worth of difference in how Romney or Gingrich would govern and I don’t see any sort of a rational comparision between Romney and Obunga, the nation could easily survive four or even eight years of Romney. At this point, I am not looking for ideological purity and would be happy to get the US govt. back under some semblence of adult supervision.


37 posted on 05/02/2012 11:50:28 AM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Right. I think Romney is probably acceptable to the broader electorate. That’s what’s wrong with America. That men like Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are considered presidential timber is truly disheartening.

Although, in Romney’s defense, at least he passes the competence test. Dislike him though I do, I won’t deny that he was a successful business man and had some genuine accomplishments in his life, unlike Hussein.


38 posted on 05/02/2012 12:13:18 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Don’t worry people. Virgil Goode will take care of that ugly “tie” thing.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

LOL!!! I really did LOL at that. Good one drew.


39 posted on 05/02/2012 12:25:13 PM PDT by no dems (TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper; All

If America reelects B. Hussein Obama, we deserve what we get and may God have mercy upon us.


40 posted on 05/02/2012 12:27:03 PM PDT by no dems (TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson