Tom Hoefling: "Mitt Romney is still a pro-choice democrat, and admits it on his own website"

Tom Hoefling for President 2012 ^ | May 2, 2012 | Tom Hoefling

[EternalVigilance]

Mitt Romney: Judicial supremacist, anti-republican, pro-choice, democrat.

Here's the proof.

Listen to the eight minute audio HERE .

*Excerpted from May 1, 2012 America's Summit, Restore the Republic call

[Antoninus]

So the choice is a partial conservative (fiscal) and a full blown classical Marxist.

Partial conservative? Surely you jest. Romney is a liberal. And a liar. And a politician with a track-record of attacking conservative ideals and working to destroy conservative candidates and promote liberal ones.

If you think that is somehow superior to weak, ineffective Obama, you're delusional. You're casting a vote for your own disenfranchisement.

[ArrogantBustard]

OBTW, and FYI ... Governor Mitt Romney:

1) Imposed "gay marriage" on the State of Massachusetts.

2) Imposed a permanent "assault weapons" ban on the State of Massachusetts.

3) Imposed mandatory socialist medical care on the State of Massachusetts.

4) Imposed taxpayer funded abortion on the State of Massachusetts.

That's not "anti-Romney BS".

That's historical truth.

How you choose to make use of that historical truth in guiding your own actions is your business. Your attempts to dismiss historical truth as "BS" are utter folly.

[D-fendr]

you have de facto stipulated to the fact that Mitt Romney is a pro-choice, anti-republican, democrat.

Horse hockey. At least attempt honest debate.

[EternalVigilance]

Do you really think you are the majority opinion on this board or anywhere else? Do you really think most conservatives are not going to vote for the GOP candidate? You look like a fool on here with all your anti-Romney BS.

"Moral principles do not depend on a majority vote. Wrong is wrong, even if everybody is wrong. Right is right, even if nobody is right."

-- Fulton J. Sheen, 1953

"Truth is incontrovertible. Ignorance can deride it; panic may resent it; malice may destroy it; but there it is."

-- Winston Churchill

"Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves."

-- Winston Churchill

[Antoninus]

You seem to have forgotten how TEAM ROMNEY put the Imam in.

Exactly. Romney supporters who expect him to be better than Obama are delusional.

[hosepipe]

[ Do you really think you are the majority opinion on this board or anywhere else? Do you really think most conservatives are not going to vote for the GOP candidate? ]

America has NOW a givernment that reflects the American people.. always have..
If Not... they will change it.. looks like they won’t..
Looks like “the People” themselves have become corrupted..

I say this merely to attempt to sway you back into reality..
Are you Corrupt or a force for “Good”?..

I ask the question, are Romney voters Shlemiel’s or Shemozzles..?..
They are one or the other.. maybe even BOTH...

[EternalVigilance]

Horse hockey. At least attempt honest debate.

You haven't engaged in honest debate on this thread yet. No matter how many times you've been prodded, you've refused to address the subject at hand at all.

[D-fendr]

Yeah, you and Churchill, all alone against the Nazi tide.

Sheesh.

How about actually fighting the real enemy for a while?

[EternalVigilance]

You obviously have no clue who, or what, the real enemy is.

If you did have a clue, you wouldn’t be running cover for a pro-choice democrat.

[Windflier]

The choice is the one we have little faith in versus the one we know is an anti-American disaster.

I disagree. There are NO appreciable differences between Obama and Romney, hence there is no real choosing between them for any sentient conservative or patriot.

The only real choice is whether to resist or not resist.

[D-fendr]

you've refused to address the subject at hand at all.

The subject at hand is whether the Obama regime is in power for the next four years.

That's reality. And how are you addressing that?

By spending your time on an internet forum trying to peel away a few votes from Obama's opponent to vote for yourself.

Woop - de - doo.

Color me not impressed by your principles.

[Antoninus]

We all know that you are a liberal democrat trying to stir the pot against Romeny in hopes that people won't vote for him so that your guy, Obama, will win. We aren't that dumb. Nice try though.

The really funny thing is that an unknown like you tries to frame a well-known conservative FReeper as an Obama supporter.

Beat it, Romney-boy.

[EternalVigilance]

The subject at hand is whether the Obama regime is in power for the next four years.

No, that's you changing the subject, because you can't deny that Romney is a judicial supremacist, anti-republican, pro-choice, democrat.

[D-fendr]

Nah, I’m just keeping you busy on here so can’t actually run a serious campaign for yourself for president. Keeps you from campaigning against Obama’s opponent, y’see.

Appears to be working.

[EternalVigilance]

Color me not impressed by your principles.

Again, the perfect Romney Republican reply.

Thanks again for being here to illustrate the points I made on last night's America's Summit call. Couldn't have done this nearly as effectively without you.

[af_vet_rr]

Myth might or might not be an apostate, but he hasn't actually done anything to us yet. Obama has.

Tell that to the murdered children of Massachusetts who aren't with us because Willard wasn't willing to stand up against abortion until it became a political liability.

[af_vet_rr]

I wonder how much of these “Romney is really a (insert your phobia here)” post are by Obama supporters trying to make people mad enough to stay home.

I wonder how many of these "if you don't support Romney, you support Obama" posts are by liberals pretending to be Conservatives and trying to carry out the work of their GOP-e masters.

[D-fendr]

Again, the perfect Romney Republican reply.

I could've typed that for you, it's the go-to when out of logic.

What you cannot address is any the question: "So what is your reasonably, possibly, achievable alternative to this regime staying in power? "

Perhaps you can address this - if it doesn't keep you away from your phone banks and envelope-stuffing of course.

[D-fendr]

liberals pretending to be Conservatives and trying to carry out the work of their GOP-e masters.

That's me! But don't tell my GOP-e master I told you.

[EternalVigilance]

As always, FR is the best microcosm there is of what is going on with a certain universe of voters, a critically important universe.

You’re simply one more case study for real conservatives around the country to look at to prove how far gone the formerly grand old party truly is.

Thanks again for playing poster boy for Romney Republicanism. No one could have done it better than you.