Posted on 05/03/2012 3:05:38 PM PDT by Kaslin
Indians were not usually separately categoried but that doesn't mean you can't find out what they were ~ look at the names given, look at what they did for a living, who lived with them, exactly where they lived ~ that latter point is very important because they could have lived on Indian lands not in dispute, or on a reservation ~ both of which would be a clue. A guy named John Crow Feather who lived somewhere in what is now Montana might have been an Indian!
I’d like to know this: was she successful in linking up with other Cherokees at Havahhd
So, she is a Jeep Cherokee?
Or maybe she is a Eugene the Jeep?
Jeep! Jeep! Jeep!
Wow that Indian pic is from Dragonball...
Yes I am an Otaku....
Princess Spreading Bull
Princess Spewing Sh!t
In Mass they are pretty stupid (look at there track record!), or at least enough are make her competitive.
She and Ward Churchill are blood brother/sisters........
Why would she lie?.....for personal gain. How could being recognized as an American Indian benefit her?....Minorities get special treatment, affirmative action, low interest loans, etc....So..Like any grifter democrat she lies...it is one of their favorite tools. But she lies by commmitting a fraud on the unsuspecting. So having committed lies and fraud in hopes of self gratuities, she milks it until 1996 when she had become a Harvard professor. At this point she had wrung all she could out of it and decided to move on to other felonies.
1. Did she receive any favored action which could have gone to a real American Indian?
2. Did she take a low interest loan unavailable to others of a different ethnicity?
3. If she took a loan or accepted a position as a Harvard student IN PLACE OF another did she defraud anyone.
4. If she was placed as a student via committing a fraud, should she be disbarred for lying to Harvard Law?
5. Did she receive any loan, grant, or money otherwise from the federal taxpayer under fraudulent malfeasance, and if so, will she be prosecuted?
Scott Brown needs to ask these questions.
He should. But she didn't go to Harvard as a student: George Washington University, University of Houston, Rutgers University, Newark. She's old enough that race wouldn't have been a factor at GWU and probably not at UH. Her claiming to be an Indian probably would have started later, when she was teaching at Texas, Pennsylvania, or Harvard.
Whitey did not want to eat lunch with her so she tried out for Indian and they did not want to eat lunch with her either?
I think I read she began the ruse from 1983 through 1996. It should not matter where she went but that she used lies to adhieve personal gain.
Be all you can be!
Anything goes in America!
If you want to be black, Hispanic or Native American just check the appropriate box on the form.
After all - people can now just decide which sex they want to be each morning when they wake up, No counselling or medical procedures necessary. Use the rest room of your choice!
So, if you want to join one of the cool victim groups and share in the taxpayer provided goodies unique to each group just do it!
Why be stuck in that outdated white skin and put up with the constant attacts on your heritage when just a simple check mark on a form can leave it all behind and let you start an exciting new life as a protected minority or a member of another government protected group?
Maybe she should have just hung a pork chop around her neck.
Not to mention fraudulent.
Now now... that’s where the “higher truth” part comes in.
You see, those things you call “facts” are inventions of dead white males. That means they are unimportant in the overall scheme of the Universe, etc.
Truth is relative — just like sexuality, gender, property ownership and all that stuff Conservatives get anal-retentive about.
To them, anyhow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.