[Bloody Sam Roberts]

The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of The United Staes of America;

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Now what is so unclear about that?

[mo]

“Now what is so unclear about that? “

Perhaps just exactly how it is We the People are going to go about rubbing the Executive Branch’s nose in the document?

[rarestia]

Now what is so unclear about that?

Apparently the same as "shall not be infringed."

My question is this: where do we start when 1) CWII ends with conservative victors OR 2) a revolutionary conservative takes the reigns and starts to roll back 100 years of progressivism?

[Paladin2]

x

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Now what is so unclear about that?

You heard the man.

Requirements for warrants cripple prosecutors and law enforcement.

They are a silly, antiquated custom that has no place in the modern world.

[AndyJackson]

It’s all very nuanced, which you would know if you were a constitutional scholar like his excellency.

[MNDude]

Don’t you know? That’s about abortion \sarc