Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Child-proof the Internet or face regulation, warns EU Commission
EU Observer ^ | 03.05.12 @ 17:52 (May 3) | Benjamin Fox

Posted on 05/05/2012 1:59:38 AM PDT by Olog-hai

The European Commission has threatened to table a comprehensive set of child internet safety rules if the software industry fails to self-regulate to protect children online.

Unveiling its "European strategy for a better internet for children' on Wednesday (2 May), the Commission said that with 75% of children regularly accessing the web, targeted measures were needed to protect them online and improve digital literacy.

Among its proposals, the EU executive has called on the IT industry to draw-up an EU-wide mechanism allowing children to report harmful content, age-appropriate privacy settings, and make stricter use of age rating to prevent children from accessing violent or pornographic material online.

But it warned that it would propose binding legislation "if self-regulation fails to deliver". …

The move by the Commission is an attempt to respond to rising concerns among parents and policy-makers that light-touch online regulation is failing to combat on-line bullying and grooming on social media sites like Facebook and Twitter as well as child sex abuse on the Internet. In 2010, a report by the IWF identified over 16,700 instances of child sexual abuse content on the web, while a survey conducted by the EU Kids Online project reported that 4 in 10 children had communicated with strangers online, been exposed to dangerous content or suffered cyberbullying. …

The Commission also demanded swift implementation by industry of legislation aimed at combating child sex abuse and pornography, as well as e-commerce and data protection rules, citing IWF evidence that over 40% of websites promoting child sex abuse were hosted in either Europe or Russia. …

(Excerpt) Read more at euobserver.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: europeanunion; eussr; internet; regulation

1 posted on 05/05/2012 1:59:47 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Its for the CHILLDRUUNNN!!

So the same people that support teaching children the most vile acts, birth control and so forth are worried about what these children see on the internet?


2 posted on 05/05/2012 2:18:53 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

No hypocrisy left behind.


3 posted on 05/05/2012 3:55:00 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

They care about the children....but when 6 year old Antili Mohamed gets herself snipped...no problem or when 6 year old Janique Mohamed gets married at 13 no problem...or when 6 year old Quinsy Smith wants a girl part they get him ready for the operation table. NO SARCASM.


4 posted on 05/05/2012 4:08:03 AM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

...and so it begins.


5 posted on 05/05/2012 4:17:38 AM PDT by RightOnline (I am Andrew Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

To be honest whenever I see politicians scream about banning porn on the internet, lets get real.. It is not banning porn, it is just to control speech and block sites like this. For the record I hate porn..


6 posted on 05/05/2012 4:19:56 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Go Mitt Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

What ever happened to parents being parents and controlling their own children’ behavior?


7 posted on 05/05/2012 4:51:09 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
But I thought the one and only purpose of the First Amendment was to protect porn?

(Yeah, I know, it's the EU and the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.)

8 posted on 05/05/2012 6:19:01 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Do I really need a sarcasm tag? Seriously? You're that dense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
It is not banning porn, it is just to control speech and block sites like this.

You got it. Powers granted to "control porn" will instead primarily be used to curtail access to "hate sites". And media and blogs will be given ultimatums to "avoid hate speech or be blocked as a hate site".

The European Establishment is increasingly worried about the number of people who no longer are willing to be PC.

9 posted on 05/05/2012 6:24:11 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Have the user first answer a simple algebra problem.
Lock it to the MAC address and increase difficulty.

Some will quit.
Most will use Wolfram.
A few may learn something?


10 posted on 05/05/2012 7:39:08 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (The best is the enemy of the good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson