Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/09/2012 11:27:32 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Rush was just commenting on this.


2 posted on 05/09/2012 11:31:00 AM PDT by skimask
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Do the unionized tour giudes get paid by the visitor?


3 posted on 05/09/2012 11:31:14 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I would think this requirement might violate HIPAA regulations.


4 posted on 05/09/2012 11:34:25 AM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I’ll never read Beck’s “Blaze” when they write titles in all caps.


5 posted on 05/09/2012 11:34:29 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
So it's just what I thought: you have to register everyone coming in for a White House tour. If you're pregnant and plan on bringing the new baby on the tour you have to register that baby even if not born yet. I guess you don't have to register if you plan on leaving the kid in the car while you take the tour.

How long in advance do you have to schedule a White House tour?

7 posted on 05/09/2012 11:37:49 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (You only have three billion heartbeats in a lifetime.How many does the government claim as its own?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

How about twins, triplets, Octomom?


8 posted on 05/09/2012 11:39:24 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1206 of our ObamaVacation from reality [and what dark chill/is gathering still/before the storm])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I thought it was that you had to register the baby in advance if the baby would be born by the tour date. Makes sense to me.

Still ... with terrorists posing as pregnant women, it probably wouldn’t be a bad idea to make sure you’ve got the same number of pregnancies entering and exiting the WH tour.

SnakeDoc


10 posted on 05/09/2012 11:41:19 AM PDT by SnakeDoctor ("I've shot people I like more for less." -- Raylan Givens, Justified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The rest of the article:

Schafer apparently wrote this in an email to a Capitol Hill staffer Tuesday morning, concluding:

Once, the baby is born, you should send an email to the VO inbox with the tour request ID number, the baby’s given name, their actual birthday and gender. We can then update the newborn guest’s information within our system. Please note that any changes to security information for newborns must be made at least 48 hours in advance.

The president is pro-abortion, and has said he does not want his daughters to be “punished with a baby“ if they ”make a mistake.” Seeing as abortion is acceptable in such circles primarily because an unborn baby is not considered an independent person, it is quite ironic that the White House is seemingly adamant about registering them as distinct from their mothers.

Or is it?

Another explanation for the email is possible. Consider that this could be the White House requiring women who pre-arrange tours before their babies are born to register them in the above manner if they plan to bring them along on the tour after they are born. This seemingly matches with the last paragraph, which asks for updated security information “at least 48 hours in advance.“ It would also make sense that the baby would then have an ”actual“ birthday and ”given name” as that same paragraph references.

What do you think?


11 posted on 05/09/2012 11:41:19 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Leads for planned parenthood’s sales team.


12 posted on 05/09/2012 11:54:30 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

No, that’s so Obama doesn’t decide to see what they taste like!


13 posted on 05/09/2012 11:55:05 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The WH just wants to make sure it’s a REAL baby, not a pound of C-4.


14 posted on 05/09/2012 11:56:35 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

How many people do obese people count as?


17 posted on 05/09/2012 12:13:50 PM PDT by Average Al (Forbidden fruit leads to many jams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Miracle on 34th Street: The White House, an official branch of the Federal govt., recognizes unborn children as human beings.

Overturn Roe v. Wade; case closed.


19 posted on 05/09/2012 12:18:38 PM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

This is absolutely great!
The federal government, by this regulation, is stating that a fetus is a human being from conception. A fetus with a name is thus a baby and entitled to the protections of the Constitution.


21 posted on 05/09/2012 12:35:41 PM PDT by BuffaloJack (End Obama's War On Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson