Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blueunicorn6

So a man and woman, husband and wife, can’t have anal or oral sex because it doesn’t produce babies? Is that what you are saying?


129 posted on 05/12/2012 3:33:05 PM PDT by turn_to
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: turn_to; Graybeard58; BlackElk; sagar; blueunicorn6; JediJones; Antoninus; Lazlo in PA; writer33; ..
129 posted on Sat May 12 2012 17:33:05 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) by turn_to: “So a man and woman, husband and wife, can’t have anal or oral sex because it doesn’t produce babies? Is that what you are saying?”

Have we degenerated so far in the conservative movement that I need to be explaining on a conservative website why normal people don't do that stuff?

Put bluntly, the parts don't fit. If you like packing fudge with your wife, please don't tell us about it. That stuff, just like Bill Clinton's escapades with Monica Lewinski, quite literally makes me want to vomit. It shouldn't be discussed in public, but our society has gotten so bad that it has become acceptable in too many circles.

By the way, deviant sexual intercourse such as that used to be illegal, and it scandalized the Congress not that many years ago when a Mafia girlfriend, when asked in a Congressional hearing why she was liked by Mafiosi, said the reason why was that she gave good oral sex (using different words, of course).

I've got bigger things to worry about than criminalizing private activities between husbands and wives and I prefer to keep the focus on promoting marriage, which **IS** key to preserving society by transmitting cultural values from one generation to another. However, things like anal and oral sex ought not even to be discussed in places where people aren't perverts.

Let's remember that things could be a lot worse than they are in the modern American conservative movement. Imagine what it would be like to be in France, where

1) the moderate conservative is a multiple adulterer now married to a woman with her own serious moral problems,
2) the right-wing candidate is a woman who has been divorced twice and is now openly living with a man to whom she is not married, and
3) the Socialist who just won the presidency dumped his ex-live-in girlfriend shortly after she lost the presidential campaign in the last election for a new live-in girlfriend who he hasn't yet bothered to marry, either.

That's where we're going if we keep being forced to choose between the lesser of two evils.

What would I do if I were a conservative patriotic Christian in France? I have no idea. What scares me is I have absolutely no doubt that a hundred years ago, any reasonably conservative American looking at our current American presidential candidates would have been just as disgusted as we are today looking at the French candidates for their presidency today. The frog and kettle seem to be boiling rather warmly now.

140 posted on 05/12/2012 5:36:55 PM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

To: turn_to
So a man and woman, husband and wife, can’t have anal or oral sex because it doesn’t produce babies? Is that what you are saying?

What we are saying is give peace a chance...

Actually, what premises what you are saying is exactly what premises what leftist scumbags are saying...

The government promotes order and the common good. Children and families that produce children contribute to the common good. As such, the government promotes the environment and provides benefits and privilege at the behest of the people to married couples... NOT because married people are forced to produce children but because they can.

Which is COMPLETELY the point as to why government involves itself in any way with marriage --it is ONLY a male and female that CAN procreate. Government does NOT force people to have children. Choosing not to have children does not diminish the possibility that children can be conceived...

HOWEVER, two metrosexual critical thinking RINO's will NEVER and can NEVER procreate so why should society subsidize such selfish anal explorers?

P.S. Go back to DU.

146 posted on 05/12/2012 9:08:19 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

To: turn_to; blueunicorn6; darrellmaurina
So a man and woman, husband and wife, can’t have anal or oral sex because it doesn’t produce babies? Is that what you are saying?

Are you saying a husband and a wife are not going to have vaginal sex, that it is not an option for them?

148 posted on 05/13/2012 2:46:08 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode not Evil (the lesser of 2 evils is still evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson