Lou Dobbs mystified by Obama-birth 'taboo'

During the Bush administration, Arpaio was granted access to DHS Alien Registration files to avoid an embarrassing situation of arresting and detaining a legal immigrant in the US.

The Obama administration is accussing Arpaio of using the Alien Registration files to profile latinos. In other words, Arpaio has Obama’s incriminatimg Alien Registration file and is sitting on it to use as a bargaining chip.

Why can’t more motions to unseal his records? keep him legally entangled fighting one challenge after another? I don’t expect you to have all the answers Red Steel, but it is frustrating as all get out to not get at what is obviously Obama’s Achilles heel."

These efforts a have been going on for years. The courts have rejected the motions, usually on grounds of standing, and other technicalities. The issues have been in every court in the land, up to including appeals to the SCOTUS. Results? '0'

I want this charlatan exposed before or after he gets out of office.

Speak to your elected Republican representatives, your state AG, and get back to us.

Research Assignment: Get up to speed on the basics by reading Leo Donofrio's amicus brief to the Georgia Supreme Court. Then check in with Sheriff Joe Arpaio and The Cold Case Posse. Your questions will no more be answered to your satisfaction than those of the rest of us. Stay tuned.

SvenMagnussen wrote:

“I sent the documents I had to Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. via UPS Next Day Air. I comfirmed with Alec that the package arrived a week after I sent it.

Orly should ask her UPS route driver for the package. It’ll comfirm Obama naturalized as a US citizen in 1983”

SvenMagnussen,

Many thanks for the info. When was this info sent?

Unfortunately, Orly is sitting on the evidence to protect Obama. Otherwise, she would follow well establish Federal Court rules and make an allegation Obama is not eligible to be POTUS in a complaint. After Obama denied the allegation, Orly would ask for a discovery conference to begin the process of obtaining the necessary evidence to be used against Obama.

Contrary to popular belief, if Obama’s appointees and supporters scrub the evidence, then Orly can announce she has a rebuttal witness. A rebuttal witness is not deposed by the Defense in discovery to protect the evidence and the witness. Any defendant powerful enough to scrub original source documents is certainly powerful enough to eliminate rebuttal evidence. Consequently, rebuttal witnesses and rebuttal evidence are not exposed until trial.

Why does Orly continually insist on exposing rebuttal evidence when it is ignored by the Court, media and general public? The way to handle it is to allege Obama naturalized in 1983. After Maricopa County resident and DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano testifies in a she can’t find Obama’s immigration files, the plaintiff informs the Court and Defense counsel she has a rebuttal witness.

The FBI, CIA, IRS and DHS won’t have access to the rebuttal witness or evidence until the day of the trial. It would be devastating to the defense to testify they can’t find Obama’s naturalization papers and then a video is shown of Obama stating the loyalty oath at a naturalization ceremony in 1983.

If the video is given to Orly, now, it would never see the light of day. I wonder how much Obama is paying her?

I repeat my assertions in my post in the thread linked below.

See my #121 & #122.

Documents were sent??!!!???

If they had to do with 0’s immigration info, then that is ANOTHER violation of the privacy act!!!!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3033966/posts?page=123#123

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.