Poll: Obama 49 - Romney 46, But..

Remember that there's another group playing at the table, and that is the NWO RiNO's, who have their own agenda to which it is most definitely in your best interest not to succumb.

In their imagined world, the United States would be a deferential society again (like the one the pioneers who settled the West left behind), where people like you are expected to know their place, scuff toes in dirt when spoken to, remove your hat when spoken to, and be openly pleased when these people, driving by in their Maybach Zeppelins, amuse themselves by throwing nickels to your kids so they can watch your little urchins scramble in the street filth for them.

********************************************************

Ok, I'll bite, give me some names and examples of what you say.

Really?

We have no idea how he is going to behave?

Isnt there something about knowing them by the fruits of their labor? Im here to tell you that the fruit Romney has bore has been exclusively socialist in nature.

Well.. Im sure some of those folks are just like me and even if we can beat the democrat socialist with our republican socialist, were smart enough to know that having a republican socialist as pres is FAR more damaging than having a democrat socialist as pres.

By all means... Elect REAL limited government conservatives to both houses of congress. Primary and replace the Ahole progressives that infest the GOP. But DO NOT vote to elect a Socialist POS like romney as president.

We may have a choice of two socialists this election cycle. One will have the support of both parties in congress when pushing his socialist agenda and the other will only have the support of one party. Do you know which is which?

Everyone like to think of themselves as being the “good guy” SuziQ... Even if their not. Even if their making a terrible mistake... Naive, is probably the most kind interpretation of what you folks are.

Im uninterested in drawing undecideds to “our side” if our side is now socialist. In fact, im more interested in making the stupid SOB’s that pushed this socialist POS romney to the forefront pay for their idiocy.

Really?

We have no idea how he is going to behave?

Isnt there something about knowing them by the fruits of their labor? Im here to tell you that the fruit Romney has bore has been exclusively socialist in nature.

Well.. Im sure some of those folks are just like me and even if we can beat the democrat socialist with our republican socialist, were smart enough to know that having a republican socialist as pres is FAR more damaging than having a democrat socialist as pres.

By all means... Elect REAL limited government conservatives to both houses of congress. Primary and replace the Ahole progressives that infest the GOP. But DO NOT vote to elect a Socialist POS like romney as president.

We may have a choice of two socialists this election cycle. One will have the support of both parties in congress when pushing his socialist agenda and the other will only have the support of one party. Do you know which is which?

Everyone like to think of themselves as being the “good guy” SuziQ... Even if their not. Even if their making a terrible mistake... Naive, is probably the most kind interpretation of what you folks are.

Im uninterested in drawing undecideds to “our side” if our side is now socialist. In fact, im more interested in making the stupid SOB’s that pushed this socialist POS romney to the forefront pay for their idiocy.

Okay, here's one -- the entire Bush family, Laura I think excepted.

George H.W. Bush looking at his watch during the debate with Slick was the clue that here was a man with better things to do than sit for an interview with the Peepul, for a job he already had by right and by breeding.

The one real hardcore belief the senior Bushes have is that People Like Us (PLU) are a true *standard*, a benchmark of social excellence, that is all the rest of us need to know about them. Andover, Yale, business, government -- what, you need more? References?! What do you mean, references?! We don' need no steenking references!!

George Herbert Walker Bush convening a mini-U.N. to decide how things should be in the Persian Gulf -- that's an example. Some day, some other little U.N. will want to decide how things are on the U.S. border.

Anent which last, see George Herbert Walker Bush starting something called NAFTA, and something else called SPP -- and something else called NASCO. And conjuring up, in back rooms of the Congress, without telling the People (as in, Little People -- Sen. Ryan of Kansas actually lied to his voters about this), a giant new transportation infrastructure that would be built and maintained privately, for private purposes, by private wealth -- people like King Juan Carlos of Spain (yeah, as in, His Most Catholic Majesty, Juan Carlos I Borbon y Borbon, King of Spain), on the territory of the United States pro bono total strangers, that would divide the nation in two, originating in the Mexican Pacific seaports and spreading out into the upper Midwest and Ontario.

I have links, if you really care.

Here's one, served cold:

http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/bohemian_grove.html

Mind you, Bohemian Club is only where these people play .... the Business Roundtable and the CFR/Trilateral Commission are where they work.

Here's another one, also posted cold: the people who put it up were very interested in Rick Perry's fronting for NASCO/SPP and their big toll-road project, but (warning!) the site's been hacked now, it won't even post to my box:

http://www.texastollparty.com/action_tellYourReps2.php

Stuff like that. North American Union, Law of the Sea Treaty, International Criminal Court. As in, New World Order (quoting GHWB again).

So there's an example.

Guy's political friends in the RNC and overseas are rebuilding your country right out from under you, and you get all toasty with a FReeper about it?

Thanks for the detailed reply. FYI I am very unhappy about the direction in which the country is headed and I can appreciate it because I grew up in the 1950’s and have experienced first hand the change.

Sometimes it comes down to the lessor of two evils.