When you said: “By law (HRS 338-14.3), Onaka’s one-sentence statement verifying the existence of a record on file certifies each and every fact supplied by Bennett on the request form.” Bennett also supplied a copy of the alleged LFBC. There would be no reason to itemize “each and every fact supplied by Bennett” if a one-sentence statement “certifies” what Bennett “supplied” with the request form. Under your logic, this would mean that one sentence would certify the entire form and NOT just the list that Bennett itemized and that Alvin T. Onaka Ph.D. itemized in return.
Under the law, there are two parts to a letter of verification. The first part addresses the request form. The second part addresses “any other information.”
You have totally misinterpreted and mischaracterized everything I said. Read post #103. Then read posts #140 & 141.