Skip to comments.
‘Clean Coal’ Means No Coal
National Review Online ^
| May 25, 2012
| Nash Keune
Posted on 05/25/2012 2:59:09 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: EGPWS
>> “Personally, I’m working on “nuclear energy” without splitting atoms” <<
.
So is the D.O.E.
They’ve been working on it furiously for 46 years, to the tune of about 6 trillion dollars, essentially without anything to show for it.
.
21
posted on
05/27/2012 6:23:11 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they were.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
22
posted on
05/27/2012 7:15:30 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: neverdem
Transparency, thy name is Obama.
So it is written, so it shall be done.
23
posted on
05/27/2012 7:25:30 PM PDT
by
Kickass Conservative
(Confucius say, short note better than long memory....)
To: neverdem
To: neverdem
” - - - Like many euphemisms, “clean coal” is an oxymoron — the adjective cancels out the noun.”
Well, if that is the way it works, then I am all for “Clean National Debt.”
25
posted on
05/27/2012 8:11:29 PM PDT
by
Graewoulf
((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson